Use of opioid antagonists

ABSTRACT

Embodiments of the invention provide methods of attenuating, e.g., inhibiting or reducing, cellular proliferation and migration, particularly endothelial cell proliferation and migration, including that associated with angiogenesis, as well as attenuating cancerous tumor growth and metastasis, using opioid antagonists, including, but not limited to, those that are peripherally restricted antagonists.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/379,010 filed Apr. 17, 2006, which is a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/US2006/07892 filed Mar. 7, 2006, which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of the filing dates of U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/659,193 filed Mar. 7, 2005, 60/725,703 filed Oct. 12, 2005, 60/731,009 filed Oct. 28, 2005, and 60/760,851 filed Jan. 20, 2006, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERAL SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants: DE12322; DE00470; and DE015830. The United States government has certain rights in this invention.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The invention relates to methods of attenuating migration and/or proliferation of endothelial cells, especially associated with tumors, as well as attenuating tumor growth and/or metastasis, utilizing opioid antagonists.

INTRODUCTION

Cellular proliferation is a normal ongoing process in all living organisms that involves numerous factors and signals that are delicately balanced to maintain regular cellular cycles. Whether or not mammalian cells will grow and divide is determined by a variety of feedback control mechanisms, which includes the availability of space in which a cell can grow, and the secretion of specific stimulatory and inhibitory factors in the immediate environment.

Unwanted proliferation or hyperproliferation, i.e., cell division and growth that is not a part of normal cellular turnover and metabolism, is associated with cells in an abnormal state or neoplasm in which the cells have lost responsiveness to normal growth controls. Pathological proliferation of cells is often associated with angiogenic, metastatic and invasive processes.

The process of angiogenesis results in the formation of new blood vessels. Under normal physiological conditions, animals, including humans, undergo angiogenesis only in very specifically restricted situations. For example, angiogenesis is normally observed in wound healing, fetal and embryonic development, and formation of the corpus luteum, endometrium and placenta.

Angiogenesis, however, can be stimulated and harnessed by some neoplasms (e.g., tumors) to increase nutrient uptake. The development of malignancy is associated with this tumor-induced angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is essential for the growth of solid tumors beyond 2-3 mm in diameter and for tumor metastasis (Folkman, 1995; reviewed in Bouck et al., 1996). In contrast to normal angiogenesis, which leads to anastomoses and capillary maturation, angiogenesis associated with neoplasia is a continuous process. Endothelial cells are activated by nearby neoplastic cells to secrete not only vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which stimulates angiogenesis, but also matrix metalloproteases (MMP) which degrade the surrounding extracellular matrix. The endothelial cells then invade the extracellular matrix where they migrate, proliferate, and organize to form new blood vessels, which support neoplasm growth and survival.

Metastasis occurs when cancer cells leave the original tumor site and migrate to other parts of the body via the bloodstream or the lymphatic system. The metastatic process involves complex intracellular mechanisms that alter cancerous cells and their interactions with surrounding cells and tissues. To begin, malignant cells break away from the primary tumor and attach to and degrade proteins that make up the surrounding extracellular matrix (ECM), which separates the tumor from adjoining tissue. By degrading these proteins, cancer cells are able to breach the ECM and escape. Thus invasion of the local extracellular matrix by tumor cells is the first step in metastasis. Further establishment of metastasis relies upon successful penetration of the circulatory or lymphatic system, and vessel extravasation at a secondary organ. The complexity of these processes and the lack of understanding of underlying molecular mechanism have hindered effective therapeutic interventions that prevent and/or inhibit metastasis of cancers. Current methods of treating metastases of cancers are often inadequate.

It is noted that suppression of any one of the steps of and/or factors involved in angiogenesis could inhibit the formation of new vessels, and therefore, affect tumor growth and generation of metastases. Indeed, it has been estimated that the elimination of a single endothelial cell could inhibit the growth of 100 tumor cells (Thorpe et al., 1995). Antibodies raised against the angiogenic factor VEGF have been shown to suppress tumor growth in vivo (Kim et al., 1993).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

There is a need for improved methods of treating cancer, especially metastatic cancers. It has surprisingly been found that opioid antagonists can inhibit endothelial proliferation and migration associated with angiogenesis, and inhibit growth and metastasis of cancerous tumors.

Important embodiments of the present invention provide methods of attenuating, e.g., inhibiting or reducing, cellular proliferation and migration, particularly endothelial cell proliferation and migration, including that associated with angiogenesis, using opioid antagonists (also known as opioid receptor antagonists), including, but not limited to, those that are peripherally restricted antagonists.

According to one aspect of the invention, a method of treatment is provided. The method involves administering to a subject with a disorder characterized by unwanted migration or proliferation of endothelial cells an effective amount of an opioid antagonist. The treatment may inhibit one or both of migration and proliferation. The unwanted migration or proliferation of endothelial cells can be unwanted migration or proliferation of vascular endothelial cells, including, but not limited to, unwanted neovascularization or angiogenesis. Examples of unwanted neovascularization include, but are not limited to, neovascularization associated with cancer and ocular neovascularization. The treated disorder can be any disorder characterized by unwanted migration or proliferation of endothelial cells. Such important disorders are cancer, sickle cell anemia, vascular wounds, proliferative retinopathies, and unwanted endothelial cell proliferation in the kidneys and the lung.

In important embodiments, the opioid antagonist is a peripheral opioid antagonist. Peripheral opioid antagonists include, but are not limited to, quaternary morphinan derivatives, piperidine-N-alkylcarboxylates, and quaternary benzomorphans, and related derivatives as well as certain PEGylated antagonists. One such important peripheral opioid antagonist is methylnaltrexone. Another opioid antagonist is alvimopan. In important embodiments, the effective amount of an antagonist is such that the subject has effective circulating blood plasma levels of the opioid antagonist continuously for at least 1 week, at least 2 weeks, at least 3 weeks and, preferably, at least 4 weeks.

In some embodiments, the invention also includes the co-administration of the opioid antagonists with agents that are not opioid antagonists, but which are nonetheless useful in treating disorders characterized by unwanted migration or proliferation of endothelial cells. Examples of such agents include anticancer agents, antineovascularization agents (for example, anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody), antidiabetes agents, anti-sickle cell agents, wound healing agents, and anti-endothelial cell proliferative agents.

It will be understood that the subjects treated in accordance with methods of the invention may or may not be on concurrent opioid therapy, depending on the particular disorder the subject has, the severity of the disorder, and the need the subject has for pain management. In some embodiments, the subject is taking concurrent opioid therapy. In some embodiments, the subject is not taking concurrent opioid therapy. In some embodiments, the subject is taking concurrent chronic opioid therapy. In some embodiments, the subject is not taking concurrent chronic opioid therapy.

According to another aspect of the invention, a method of inhibiting VEGF activity in endothelial cells is provided. The method involves contacting the cells with an effective amount of an opioid antagonist.

According to yet another aspect of the invention, a method of inhibiting exogenous opioid-induced cellular migration or proliferation in endothelial cells is provided. The method involves contacting the cells with an effective amount of an opioid antagonist.

According to a further aspect of the invention, a method of inhibiting RhoA activation in endothelial cells is provided. The method involves contacting the cells with an effective amount of an opioid antagonist.

According to any of the foregoing embodiments, the opioid antagonist suitably is a peripheral opioid antagonist, more suitably, a mu-opioid antagonist (also known as a mu-opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist, or a MOR antagonist), and most suitably, methylnaltrexone.

In some embodiments, the invention provides methods of attenuating migration and/or proliferation of endothelial cells of a tumor or cancer, comprising contacting the cells with an antimigratory or anti-proliferative amount of an opioid antagonist. In another aspect, the invention provides methods of attenuating angiogenesis associated with cancer. Thus, the invention contemplates treating, for example, a human cancer patient by attenuating angiogenesis in a cancerous tissue of a patient, through administering to the cancer tissue of the patient an effective amount of an opioid antagonist.

In other embodiments, the invention also provides a method of treating abnormal neovascularization, comprising administering to a patient in need of such treatment, an amount of an opioid antagonist effective to inhibit the formation of blood vessels.

Importantly, further embodiments of the invention also include a method of attenuating tumor progression and metastasis in animal tissues, comprising contacting tumor cells or tissues with a growth-inhibiting amount of an opioid antagonist, and a method of attenuating proliferation of hyperproliferative cells in a subject, comprising administering to the subject at least one opioid antagonist, in an amount which is effective to attenuate proliferation of the hyperproliferative cells. In another embodiment, the method involves administering a peripheral opioid antagonist, especially a peripheral mu-opioid antagonist and, in particular, a quaternary derivative of noroxymorphone, to a subject with cancer, e.g., lung cancer, whether or not the cancer involves angiogenesis, to treat or inhibit the development or recurrence of the cancer. Cancers not involving angiogenesis include those that do not involve the formation of a solid tumor fed by neovasculature. Certain blood cell cancers fall into this category, for example: leukemias (cancer of the leukocytes or white cells), lymphomas (arising in the lymph nodes or lymphocytes), and some cancers of the bone marrow elements. The method thus involves administering to a subject with a disorder characterized by hyperproliferation of cells an effective amount of a peripheral opioid antagonist. In one embodiment, the cells are cancer cells. The cancer cells may be cancer cells associated with angiogenesis or they may be unassociated with angiogenesis. In some embodiments, the peripheral opioid antagonist is methylnaltrexone.

In further embodiments, the invention provides methods of treating cancer, wherein a peripheral opioid antagonist and at least one other therapeutic agent that is not an opioid or opioid antagonist are co-administered to the patient. Suitable therapeutic agents include anticancer agents (including chemotherapeutic agents and antineoplastic agents), as well as other antiangiogenesis agents. It has been discovered that opioid antagonists co-administered with various anticancer drugs, radiotherapy or other antiangiogenic drugs can give rise to a significantly enhanced anti-proliferative effect on cancerous cells, thus providing an increased therapeutic effect, e.g., employing peripheral opioid antagonists to certain tumors can potentiate their response to other therapeutic regimens. Specifically, a significantly increased antiproliferative effect, including but not limited to, a significantly increased antiangiogenic effect, is obtained with co-administered combinations as described in more detail below. Not only can an existing regimen be enhanced, but new regimens are possible, resulting, for example, in lower concentrations of the anticancer compound, a lower dosing of radiation, or lower concentration of other antiangiogenic drugs, compared to the treatment regimes in which the drugs or radiation are used alone. There is the potential, therefore, to provide therapy wherein adverse side effects associated with the anticancer or other antiangiogenic drugs or radiotherapy are considerably reduced than normally observed with the anticancer or other antiangiogenic drugs or radiotherapy when used alone.

Thus, in one aspect of the invention, a method of treatment is provided, which involves administering to a subject with a disorder characterized by hyperproliferation of cells an effective amount of an opioid antagonist and an anticancer agent, radiation, or an antiangiogenic agent. In one embodiment, the cells are cancer cells. In another embodiment, the opioid antagonist is a peripheral opioid antagonist, especially a peripheral mu-opioid antagonists (i.e., a peripheral MOR antagonist). In another aspect, the peripheral opioid antagonist is methylnaltrexone. In further aspect of the invention, a method of reducing the risk of recurrence of a cancer in a subject after medical intervention is provided. The method involves administering to the subject before, during or after the medical intervention an effective amount of an opioid antagonist and an anticancer agent, radiation, or an antiangiogenic agent. In one embodiment, the opioid antagonist is a peripheral opioid antagonist. In one embodiment, the peripheral opioid antagonist is methylnaltrexone.

In another aspect of the invention, the opioid antagonists are used peri-operatively. By “peri-operatively,” it is meant immediately before (e.g., in preparation for), during, and/or immediately after a surgery or a surgical or endoscopic procedure, e.g., colonoscopy, gastrolaparoscopy, and especially a surgery or surgical procedure involving the removal of a tumor. The opioid antagonists act to attenuate the recurrence of and/or the metastasis of the tumor, especially that arising from angiogenesis associated therewith.

It is anticipated that the opioid antagonist may suitably be given in a continuous dosing regimen, e.g., a regimen that maintains a minimum, and even more suitably, a relatively constant blood level, such as by continuous infusion, including via implant. It is also contemplated that the opioid antagonist mat be suitably injected directly intratumorally or released from an intratumoral implant. It is further contemplated that the methods of the present invention may have prophylactic value in certain disorders associated with abnormal angiogenesis. Thus, the invention provides a method of preventing the appearance or re-appearance of a disorder in a mammal, the disorder being characterized by unwanted endothelial cell migration or proliferation, including abnormal angiogenesis, comprising administering to a mammal in need of such treatment, an effective amount of an opioid antagonist, wherein the disorder is a cancer, sickle cell anemia, ocular neovascular diseases, diabetes, ocular retinopathy, or other unwanted endothelial proliferation in kidneys, eye or lung. It will therefore be understood that, as used herein, treating a subject with a disorder characterized by unwanted endothelial cell proliferation or migration includes treating a subject with an active disorder to inhibit or cure the disorder and treating a subject to inhibit a disorder from re-occurring. For example, the subject may have had a solid tumor removed, and the subject may receive the treatment to inhibit the tumor from recurrence.

In attenuating cell proliferation, the invention provides a method of treatment of abnormal cell proliferation of a cell expressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in a mammal which comprises administering to the mammal a therapeutically effective amount of an opioid antagonist. The invention also includes a method of treating cancerous tissue in a subject comprising administering to the subject an amount of an opioid antagonist sufficient to inhibit VEGF production in the cancerous tissue, as well as a method of treating angiogenic disease, the method comprising contacting a tissue or a population of endothelial cells with a composition comprising an amount of at least one of an opioid antagonist under conditions effective to inhibit VEGF-induced angiogenesis and to treat angiogenic disease.

In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of inhibiting or reducing angiogenesis, particularly opioid-induced angiogenesis, e.g., of tumor cells, by administering or providing an opioid antagonist, particularly a peripheral opioid antagonist, to cells undergoing angiogenesis. In a further aspect, the invention provides methods of treating opioid-induced angiogenesis in patients receiving opioid treatment or in patients where the angiogenesis is induced by endogenous opioids. The former group is typically cancer patients on opioid-based pain management. The methods comprise administering an opioid antagonist to a patient in an antiangiogenic amount, e.g., an amount sufficient to inhibit or reduce the opioid-induced angiogenesis. In those patients receiving opioid treatment, the opioid and the peripheral opioid antagonist may be co-administered. Peripheral opioid antagonists can, thus, be used to inhibit or reduce the angiogenic effects of opioids on tumor cells, and attenuate the growth of a tumor.

Suitable opioid antagonists generally include heterocyclic amine compounds that belong to several different classes of compounds. For example, one class is suitably tertiary derivatives of morphinan, and in particular, tertiary derivatives of noroxymorphone. In one embodiment, the tertiary derivative of noroxymorphone is, e.g., naloxone or naltrexone.

Suitable peripheral opioid antagonists are also generally heterocyclic amine compounds that may belong to several different classes of compounds. For example, one class is suitably quaternary derivatives of morphinan, and in particular, quaternary derivatives of noroxymorphone. In one embodiment, the quaternary derivative of noroxymorphone is, e.g., N-methylnaltrexone (or simply methylnaltrexone). In other embodiments, certain substituted tertiary morphinans are also suitably peripherally restricted in activity. Another class of peripheral antagonists is N-substituted piperidines. In one embodiment, the N-piperidine is a piperidine-N-alkylcarbonylate, such as, e.g., alvimopan. Another class of compounds which may be of value in the methods of the present invention is quaternary derivatives of benzomorphans. Also, available as peripheral opioid antagonists are certain polymeric conjugates of opioid antagonists, e.g., PEGylated opioid antagonists.

In some embodiments of the invention, the opioid antagonist may be a mu-opioid antagonist (i.e., a MOR antagonist). In other embodiments, the opioid antagonist may be a kappa opioid antagonist. The invention also encompasses administration of more than one opioid antagonist, including combinations of mu antagonists, combinations of kappa antagonists and combinations of mu and kappa antagonists, for example, a combination of methylnaltrexone and alvimopan, or a combination of naltrexone and methylnaltrexone.

In other embodiments, it is contemplated that increased expression levels of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) in subjects samples is indicative of responsiveness to treatment with MOR antagonist. Expression levels are correlated to therapeutic efficiency of MOR antagonist treatment. Increased expression levels can be a measure of cancer prognosis, i.e., of developing cancer or a recurrence of cancer.

In further embodiments, the invention provides methods of treating opioid-induced angiogenesis in patients receiving an opioid, wherein a peripheral opioid antagonist and at least one other therapeutic agent that is not an opioid or opioid antagonist are co-administered to the patient. Suitable therapeutic agents include anticancer agents (including chemotherapeutic agents and antineoplastic agents), as well as other antiangiogenesis agents.

In yet another aspect, the invention provides a method of reducing the risk of recurrence of a cancer or tumor after medical intervention (such intervention to include but not be limited to surgery, e.g., pulmonary surgery, surgical and endoscopic procedures, e.g., colonoscopy, gastrolaparoscopy, chemotherapy, etc.), comprising co-administering to a cancer patient an opioid antagonist. Thus, the invention contemplates, for example, a method of minimizing the post-operative recurrence of. e.g., breast cancer, in a patient, comprising administering to the patient an effective amount of an opioid antagonist. Peripheral opioid antagonists in accordance with the present invention, e.g., MNTX, can also inhibit VEGF, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), or sphingosine 1-phosphate (SIP)-stimulated or induced cell proliferation in the endothelial cells.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The invention may be better understood and appreciated by reference to the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:

FIG. 1 is a bar graph of dose-dependent inhibition of human microvascular endothelial cell (HMVEC) migration, depicting the results from Example 1.

FIG. 2 is a bar graph of dose-dependent inhibition of human microvascular endothelial cell migration, depicting the results from Example 2.

FIG. 3 is a bar graph of dose-dependent inhibition of HMVEC migration using MNTX and MNTX+DAMGO.

FIG. 4 is a bar graph of dose-dependent inhibition of HMVEC migration using naloxone and naloxone+DAMGO.

FIG. 5 is a bar graph of dose-dependent effect of M3G and M6G on HMVEC migration.

FIG. 6 is a photomicrograph that shows morphine induced endothelial cell migration in the presence and absence of MNTX. Panel A=Control, Panel B=MS (morphine sulfate), Panel C=MNTX, and Panel D=MS+MNTX. Arrows are shown in Panel A to highlight several cells that have successfully migrated across the membrane.

FIG. 7 is a bar graph of percent proliferation (A) and migration (B) of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of VEGF, morphine and DAMGO with or without MNTX.

FIG. 8 is (A) a panel of immunoblots indicating the tyrosine phosphorylation (activation) of anti-VEGF R.1 (Flt-1) and 2 (Flk-1) using immunoprecipitated VEGF R.1 or 2 and anti-phospho-tyrosine in human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of VEGF, morphine and DAMGO with or without MNTX and (B) a bar graph of percent proliferation and migration of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of VEGF, morphine and DAMGO with or without VEGF R inhibitor.

FIG. 9 is a panel of immunoblots indicating RhoA activation using anti-RhoA in human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of VEGF, morphine and DAMGO with or without MNTX (A) or VEGF R inhibitor (B).

FIG. 10 is a panel of immunoblots (A) of anti-RhoA of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of scramble siRNA (targeting no known human mRNA sequence) or RhoA siRNA and a bar graph of percent proliferation (B) and migration (C) of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of VEGF, morphine and DAMGO with or without scramble siRNA (targeting no known human mRNA sequence) or RhoA siRNA.

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram summarizing the mechanism of MNTX effects on angiogenesis.

FIG. 12 is a bar graph of percent proliferation above control of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of S1P, VEGF, PDGF, morphine and DAMGO with or without MNTX.

FIG. 13 is a bar graph of percent migration above control of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of S1P, VEGF, PDGF, morphine and DAMGO with or without MNTX.

FIG. 14 is a bar graph of percent proliferation above control of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of S1P, VEGF, PDGF, morphine and DAMGO with scramble (control) siRNA or with mu-opioid receptor siRNA.

FIG. 15 is a bar graph of percent migration above control of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of S1P, VEGF, PDGF, morphine and DAMGO with scramble (control) siRNA or with mu-opioid receptor siRNA.

FIG. 16 is a panel of immunoblots indicating phosphorylation (activation) of the mu-opioid receptor using immunoprecipitated mu-opioid receptor and (A, C) anti-phospho-serine, (B, D) anti-phospho-threonine of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of morphine, DAMGO, S1P, VEGF, PDGF with MNTX (C, D) or without MNTX (A, B); (E) is an immunoblot of anti-mu-opioid receptor.

FIG. 17 is an anti-RhoA immunoblot of (A, B) activated RhoA and (C) total RhoA of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of morphine, DAMGO, S1P, VEGF, PDGF with MNTX (B) and without MNTX (A).

FIG. 18 is a panel of immunoblots of top panel: (A, B) anti-phospho-tyrosine, (C) anti-VEGF R and bottom panel: (A, B) anti-phospho-tyrosine, (C) anti-PDGF R, of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of morphine, DAMGO, VEGF (top panel) or PDGF (bottom panel) with MNTX (B in each panel) or without MNTX (A in each panel).

FIG. 19 is a panel of immunoblots indicating tyrosine phosphorylation (activation) of the S1P₃ receptor using immunoprecipitated S1P₃ receptor and (A, B) anti-phospho-tyrosine, (C) anti-S1P₃ R, of human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of morphine, DAMGO, and S1P with MNTX (B) or without MNTX (A).

FIG. 20 is a bar graph of percent proliferation above control of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of S1P, VEGF, PDGF, morphine and DAMGO with scramble (control) siRNA or with RhoA siRNA.

FIG. 21 is a bar graph of percent migration above control of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of S1P, VEGF, PDGF, morphine and DAMGO with scramble (control) siRNA or with RhoA siRNA.

FIG. 22 is an schematic diagram summarizing the mechanism of MNTX effects on RhoA activation and angiogenesis.

FIG. 23 is a graph of percent proliferation above control of microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of VEGF with MNTX, with 5-FU and with a combination of MNTX and 5-FU.

FIG. 24 is a graph of percent migration above control of microvascular endothelial cells in the presence of VEGF with MNTX, with Bevacizumab and with a combination of MNTX and Bevacizumab.

FIG. 25 is a bar graph of the effects of MNTX, 5-FU, and a combination of both on SW 480 human colorectal cancer cell line.

FIG. 26 is a bar graph of the effects of MNTX, 5-FU, and a combination of both on HCTII6 human colorectal cancer cell line.

FIG. 27 is a bar graph of the effects of MNTX, 5-FU, and a combination of both on MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line.

FIG. 28 is a bar graph of the effects of MNTX, 5-FU, and a combination of both on non-small lung cancer cell (NSLCC) line.

FIG. 29 A-C, wherein (A) is a bar graph of the inhibition of Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) cell proliferation using siRNA-induced knock-down of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) expression; (B) is a bar graph of the inhibition of serum-induced invasion by LLC cells using siRNA-induced knock-down of MOR siRNA or control RNA; and (C) is an in vive imaging with LLC cells transfected with either MOR siRNA or control RNA.

FIGS. 30 A and B are a set of bar graphs depicting (A) dose-dependent inhibition of LLC cell proliferation; and (B) invasion using methylnaltrexone (MNTX).

FIG. 31 A-D, wherein (A) is a photograph of primary LLC tumor growth in wild-type and MOR knock-out (MOR1 −/−) mice; (B) is a bar graph depicting the quantification of LLC primary tumor volume in wild-type (WT) and MOR knock-out (MOR −/−) mice: (C) is an in vivo image showing metastatic lesions of wild-type (WT) and MOR knock-out (MOR1 −/−) mice implanted with LLC cells; and (D) is a bar graph showing the quantification of metastatic lesions in wild-type (WT) and MOR knock-out (MOR −/−) mice visualized using ProSense 680 (Pro) and MMPSense (MMP) probes.

FIG. 32 A-C are a series of graphs showing (A) the inhibition of LLC tumor growth; (B) formation of lung micrometastases; and (C) macrometastases in mice implanted with LLC cells and treated with MNTX.

FIG. 33 is a photomicrograph of H&E stained lung sections showing a decrease in lung macrometastases (arrows) in mice implanted with LLC cells in the flank and treated with MNTX.

FIG. 34 is a photograph of gross lung pathology showing the decrease in lung macrometastases (arrows) in mice implanted with LLC cells in the flank and treated with MNTX.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention provide methods of attenuating abnormal or undesirable migration and/or proliferation of endothelial cells. As such, some embodiments provide methods for attenuating angiogenesis in a tissue or an organ of a subject by the use of opioid antagonists, and a novel approach for treating angiogenic related diseases and other hyperproliferative diseases in mammals. For example, as described above, solid tumors rely on the generation of new blood vessels for nutrients to reach the cells within the tumor. The growth factors required for angiogenesis can be produced by the tumor cells or alternatively, exogenous factors, such as opioids, which can stimulate new blood vessel growth. Embodiments of the present invention by the use of opioid antagonists provide a novel therapeutic approach to the treatment of such tumors, wherein the generation of new blood vessels within the tumor, rather than the tumor cells themselves, is the target. Such treatment is not likely to lead to the development of resistant tumor cells.

Described herein are opioid antagonists that inhibit proliferation and migration induced by opioids, endogenous or exogenous, and growth factors, such as VEGF, PDGF, SIP etc. Mu-opioid antagonists and peripheral opioid antagonists, in particular, showed a substantial efficacy in inhibiting opioid- and growth factor-induced proliferation and migration of endothelial cells. The peripheral opioid antagonist methylnaltrexone (MNTX) inhibited both opioid- and growth factor-induced proliferation and migration in a concentration dependent manner. In addition, naloxone also inhibited opioid-induced endothelial migration. It should be noted, however, that the naloxone inhibition of DAMGO-induced migration of endothelial cells occurred at a relatively high micromolar concentration of naloxone. Furthermore, it has now been discovered that opioid antagonists, and the peripheral opioid antagonist MNTX in particular, inhibit agonist-induced endothelial cell (EC) proliferation and migration via inhibition of receptor phosphorylation and/or transactivation and subsequent inhibition of RhoA activation. The agonists can be opioids, exogenous and/or endogenous, angiogenic factors (VEGF), and other proliferation and/or migration stimulating factors (PDGF, S1P, S1P₃ receptor, RhoA, etc). These results suggest that inhibition of angiogenesis by opioid antagonists can be a useful therapeutic intervention for, among other disorders, cancer.

The present invention also provides methods of attenuating abnormal or undesirable proliferation of cancer cells per se. This aspect of the invention is useful in situations involving the presence or absence of angiogenic activity. The absence of angiogenic activity is evidenced by one or more of the following characteristics: nonsolid tumors or tumors where there is repulsion of existing blood vessels and/or absence of microvessels within the tumor, limited growth, for example, up to about 1 mm in diameter in vivo, at which time further expansion is stopped, harmless to the host until it switches to an angiogenic phenotype, etc. Nonangiogenic tumors can be completely avascular or they can contain empty lumen without red blood cells. The gross difference between the nonangiogenic and angiogenic tumors (i.e. white vs. red tumors) is most likely due to the reactive hyperemia that accompanies the onset of blood flow after the angiogenic switch is completed in a previously hypoxic tumor. Examples of nonangiogenic tumor lineages include, but are not limited to, breast adenocarcinoma, osteosarcoma, glioblastoma, embryonic kidney tumors etc. There are many factors that could play a role in tumor dormancy and the rate-determining step for tumor expansion of nonangiogenic tumors could be governed by lack of angiogenesis and/or differentiation programs, tumor cell survival, immune response to the host etc. Although some nonagiogenic tumors never switch to an angiogenic phenotype, many undergo spontaneous transformation into an angiogenic and harmful phenotype. Therefore, treatment of nonangiogenic tumors is of therapeutic significance.

Cancers not involving angiogenesis include those that do not involve the formation of a solid tumor fed by neovasculature. Certain blood cell cancers can fall into this category, for example: leukemias, including acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and hairy cell leukemia; lymphomas (arising in the lymph nodes or lymphocytes) including Hodgkin lymphoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, cutaneous lymphoma, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma, MALT lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, primary central nervous system lymphoma; and some cancers of the bone marrow elements including Ewing's sarcoma and osteosarcoma.

Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of the structure and function of the invention set forth in the following description or illustrated in the appended figures of the drawing. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of terms such as “including,” “comprising,” or “having” and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the item listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items.

Unless otherwise noted, technical terms are used according to conventional usage. As used herein, however, the following definitions may be useful in aiding the skilled practitioner in understanding the invention:

“Subject” refers to mammals such as humans, dogs, cats, and horses.

“Chronic opioid use” refers to and is characterized by the need for substantially higher levels of opioid to produce the therapeutic benefit as a result of prior opioid use, as is well known in the art. Chronic opioid use as used herein includes daily opioid treatment for a week or more or intermittent opioid use for at least two weeks.

“Alkyl” refers to an aliphatic hydrocarbon group which is saturated and which may be straight, branched or cyclic having from 1 to about 10 carbon atoms in the chain, and all combinations and subcombinations of chains therein. Exemplary alkyl groups include methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl, see-butyl, tert-butyl, pentyl, hexyl, heptyl, octyl, nonyl and decyl.

“Lower alkyl” refers to an alkyl group having 1 to about 6 carbon atoms. “Alkenyl” refers to an aliphatic hydrocarbon group containing at least one carbon-carbon double bond and having from 2 to about 10 carbon atoms in the chain, and all combinations and sub combinations of chains therein. Exemplary alkenyl groups include vinyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl, heptenyl, octenyl, nonenyl and decenyl groups.

“Alkynyl” refers to an aliphatic hydrocarbon group containing at least one carbon-carbon triple bond and having from 2 to about 10 carbon atoms in the chain, and combinations and sub combinations of chains therein. Exemplary alkynyl groups include ethynyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl, heptenyl, octenyl, nonenyl and decenyl groups.

“Alkylene” refers to a bivalent aliphatic hydrocarbon group having from 1 to about 6 carbon atoms, and all combinations and subcombinations of chains therein. The alkylene group may be straight, branched or cyclic. There may be optionally inserted along the alkylene group one or more oxygen, sulfur or optionally substituted nitrogen atoms, wherein the nitrogen substituent is alkyl as described previously.

“Alkenylene” refers to an alkylene group containing at least one carbon-carbon double bond. Exemplary alkenylene groups include ethenylene (—CH═CH—) and propenylene (CH═:CHCH2-).

“Cycloalkyl” refers to any stable monocyclic or bicyclic ring having from about 3 to about 10 carbons, and all combinations and subcombinations of rings therein. The cycloalkyl group may be optionally substituted with one or more cycloalkyl-group substituents. Exemplary cycloalkyl groups include cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cycloheptyl and cyclooctyl groups.

“Cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl” refers to a linear alkyl group, preferably a lower alkyl group, substituted at a terminal carbon with a cycloalkyl group, preferably a C₃-C₈ cycloalkyl group. Exemplary cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl groups include cyclohexylmethyl, cyclohexylethyl, cyclopentylethyl, cyclopentylpropyl, cyclopropylmethyl and the like.

“Cycloalkenyl” refers to an oletinically unsaturated cycloaliphatic group having from about 4 to about 10 carbons, and all combinations and subcombinations of rings therein.

“Alkoxy” refers to an alkyl-a-group where alkyl is as previously described. Exemplary alkoxy groups include, for example, methoxy, ethoxy, propoxy, butoxy and heptoxy.

“Alkoxy-alkyl” refers to an alkyl-O-alkyl group where alkyl is as previously described.

“Acyl” means an alkyl-CO group wherein alkyl is as previously described. Exemplary acyl groups include acetyl, propanoyl, 2-methylpropanoyl, butanoyl and palmitoyl.

“Aryl” refers to an aromatic carbocyclic radical containing from about 6 to about 10 carbons, and all combinations and subcombinations of rings therein. The aryl group may be optionally substituted with one or two or more aryl group substituents. Exemplary aryl groups include phenyl and naphthyl.

“Aryl-substituted alkyl” refers to a linear alkyl group, preferably a lower alkyl group, substituted at a terminal carbon with an optionally substituted aryl group, preferably an optionally substituted phenyl ring. Exemplary aryl-substituted alkyl groups include, for example, phenylmethyl, phenyl ethyl and 3-(4-methylphenyl)propyl.

“Heterocyclic” refers to a monocyclic or multicyclic ring system carbocyclic radical containing from about 4 to about 10 members, and all combinations and subcombinations of rings therein, wherein one or more of the members of the ring is an element other than carbon, for example, nitrogen, oxygen or sulfur. The heterocyclic group may be aromatic or nonaromatic. Exemplary heterocyclic groups include, for example, pyrrole and piperidine groups.

“Halo” refers to fluoro, chloro, bromo or iodo.

“Peripheral.” in reference to opioid antagonists, designates opioid antagonists that act primarily on opioid receptors of physiological systems and components external to the central nervous system, e.g., they do not readily cross the blood-brain barrier in an amount effective to inhibit the central effects of opioids. In other words, peripheral opioid antagonists do not effectively inhibit the analgesic effects of opioids when administered peripherally, e.g., they do not reduce the analgesic effect of the opioids. For example, the peripheral opioid antagonist compounds employed in the methods of the present invention exhibit high levels of activity with respect to gastrointestinal tissue, while exhibiting reduced or substantially no central nervous system (CNS) activity. The peripheral opioid antagonist compounds employed in the present methods suitably exhibit less than about 5-15% of their pharmacological activity in the CNS, with about 0% (e.g., no CNS activity) being most suitable. The non-central acting characteristic of a peripheral opioid antagonist is often related to charge, polarity and/or size of the molecule. For example, peripherally-acting quaternary amine opioid antagonists are positively charged while the central-acting tertiary amine opioid antagonists are neutral molecules. The peripheral opioid antagonists useful in the present invention are typically mu and/or kappa opioid antagonists.

As used herein, “antiangiogencsis” or “antiangiogcnic” is meant to refer to the capability of a molecule/compound to attenuate, e.g., inhibit, reduce or modulate, proliferation of new blood vessels, in general, and, for example, to reduce or inhibit migration and proliferation of human microvascular endothelial cells in culture in the presence of certain growth factors. As described above, the formation of new blood vessels by endothelial cells involves migration, proliferation and differentiation of the cells.

“Metastasis” is meant to refer to the ability of cells of a cancer to disseminate and form new foci of growth at noncontinguous sites (i.e., to form metastases). See, e.g., definition of metastasis in the Basic Science of Oncology, Tammak et al., eds, McGrow-Hill (New York) 1992.

In the following description of the methods of the invention, process steps are carried out at room temperature and atmospheric pressure unless otherwise specified. It also is specifically understood that any numerical range recited herein includes all values from the lower value to the upper value, e.g., all possible combinations of numerical values between the lowest value and the highest value enumerated are to be considered to be expressly stated in this application. For example, if a concentration range or beneficial effect range is stated as 1% to 50%, it is intended that values such as 2% to 40%, 10% to 30%, or 1% to 3%, etc., are expressly enumerated in this specification. These are only examples of what is specifically intended.

In one aspect, embodiments of the present invention relate to methods of attenuating abnormal or undesirable cell, particularly endothelial cell, migration and/or proliferation, and angiogenesis in tissue or an organ of a subject. The methods comprise providing or administering one or more opioid antagonists in an effective amount to endothelial cells of the tissue or organ of a patient to inhibit endothelial cell migration and proliferation, and angiogenesis. The angiogenesis may, in part, be the result of receiving opioid treatment, particularly for pain management in cancer patients, or having high levels of endogenous opioids.

It has been observed that morphine and the mu-agonist enkephalin DAMGO ([D-Ala², N-McPhe⁴, Gly⁵-ol]-enkephalin), each cause a dose-dependent increase in migration of endothelial cells similar to that of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as measured by, e.g., a chemotaxis assay (as detailed in the examples below) or other similar assays used to identify factors in tumor angiogenesis and the drugs that affect it. At clinically relevant concentrations of morphine, the magnitude of the effect is approximately 70% of that which is achieved by VEGF. This morphine-based endothelial cell migration is attenuated by the mu-opioid antagonist methylnaltrexone (MNTX) in a dose-dependent fashion. For example, endothelial cell migration induced by morphine, in concentrations as low as 10⁻⁷ M, is significantly blocked by 10⁻⁷ M MNTX (see, FIG. 2). This attenuation strongly suggesting that endothelial cell migration is mediated by morphine action on the mu-opioid receptor (MOR). As described in the examples below, the effect via the MOR rather than other opioid receptors is confirmed by experiments that show the highly selective synthetic enkephalin mu-agonist DAMGO also induces migration. The migratory effect induced by DAMGO is also blocked by MNTX (see, FIG. 3).

In one comprehensive review (Neumann et al. Pain 1982; 13:247-52), analgesia in cancer patients was associated with a range of steady state concentrations of morphine and plasma ranging from 6 to 364 ng/mL. It was observed that an effect of morphine which causes endothelial cell migration at 100 ng/mL is well within the clinical dose range. It, therefore, is believed by the inventors herein that a dose of MNTX which will maintain plasma levels of MNTX at minimum levels of between about 25 and 150 ng/mL would be suitable. Such doses are attainable and are well tolerated (Yuan et al., J Clin Pharmacol 2005, 45:538-46).

Alvimopan, another selective peripheral opioid antagonist given orally, is in late stage development for prophylaxis of postoperative ileus and the management of opioid induced constipation (Moss et al., Pain relief without side effects: peripheral opioid antagonists. In Schwartz, A. J., editor, 33rd ASA Refresher Course in Anesthesiology, Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (in press).) There is some transpassage of alvimopan across the membrane (J. Foss, et al., Clin. Pharm. & Ther. 2005, PII-90, p. 74) and it may, therefore, possess the ability to reverse some of the systemic effects of opioids without affecting analgesia even when given orally.

Other opioid antagonists in development such as certain substituted morphinans, e.g., ALKS-37, and polymeric conjugated opioid antagonist, e.g., PEGylated antagonists, may be of value in the methods embodied in the present invention.

Without being bound by any particular theory, it may be that the mechanism of mu-opioid effect on endothelial cell migration occurs at the membrane level as MNTX, unlike naloxone, is a charged molecule at physiological pH. Morphine acts via G-protein coupled receptors, while VEGF acts by receptor tyrosine kinases. While the actions of mu agonists and VEGF may be independent, there is growing evidence of receptor transactivation as a mechanism. A prior investigation demonstrated that pertussis toxin dependent GPCRs transactivate VEGF receptor-2/FI K1 (Zeng, H. et al., J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278:20738-45). By this manner, morphine could transactivate F11 c-1 and promote an environment where endothelial cell proliferation and tumor growth could occur. A recent study of MOR knockout mice infected with T241 fibrosarcoma cells demonstrated significant differences in the incidences of tumor growth and a 10-fold increase in F11 c-1 expression in morphine-treated mice versus controls, versus no increase in morphine-treated KO mice (K. Gupta, personal communication). This provides further evidence that morphine stimulates endothelial cell proliferation and promotes tumor growth probably by trans activating FLKI phosphorylation. As such, embodiments of the present invention provide potential clinical strategies using MNTX as well as other peripheral opioid antagonist in conjunction with current therapies targeting VEGF. Although a direct effect by receptor transactivation is possible, a potential additional factor involved in the proliferation of tumors may well be the role of chemokines as integrators of pain and inflammation. A recent review on this subject (White et al. Nature Rev. Drug Discovery 2005; 4:834-44) also suggests a possible role for leukocytes in activating opioid receptors.

Furthermore, it was observed that morphine, DAMGO and VEGF stimulate RhoA activation which is inhibited by opioid antagonists, such as MNTX. RhoA is an important signaling molecule involved in angiogenesis (Acpfelbacher et al., 1997; Cascone et al., 2003; Hoang et al., 2004; Liu and Sanger, 2004.) VEGF receptor transactivation is important for opiate-induced RhoA activation. Silencing RhoA expression blocked opioid- and VEGF-induced endothelial cell (EC) proliferation and migration, demonstrating a role for RhoA activation in agonist-induced EC angiogenic activity. The MNTX mediated attenuation of RhoA activation may be important for the inhibitory role of MNTX on opioid and VEGF induced angiogenesis.

Because morphine and other opioids at clinical doses enhance endothelial cell migration, embodiments of the present invention may be of therapeutic value in opioid antagonist treatment for patients on significant and sustained doses of opioids that have tumors relying on the angiogenic process. Further, while the inventors' clinical observations have focused on morphine, which is exogenously administered, endogenous opioids, which are released by stress or pain, may also play a role in endothelial cell migration. Based on endothelial cell migration experiments detailed below in the examples, MNTX and other opioid antagonists generally are of therapeutic value as an antiangiogenic therapy even absent exogenous opioid administration (as detailed herein). It is envisioned that the methods embodied in the present invention will inhibit or reduce the growth of blood vessels within and to a tumor. Inhibiting the growth of blood vessels within tumors prevents nutrients and oxygen from being supplied to the tumor to support growth beyond a certain size. Minimizing the number of blood vessels or other tumors also lessens the probability that the tumor will metastasize.

Embodiments of the present invention may be of therapeutic value in opioid antagonist treatment for patients who have tumors relying on the angiogenic process. Tumors that rely on angiogenic processes are solid tumors, leukemias and myelomas. Solid tumors include, but are not limited to, adrenal cortical carcinoma, tumors of the bladder; squamous cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinomas; tumors of the bone; adamantinoma, aneurysmal bone cysts, chondroblastoma, chondroma, chondromyxoid fibroma, chondrosarcoma, fibrous dysplasia of the bone, giant cell tumour, osteochondroma, ostcosarcoma; breast tumors; secretory ductal carcinoma, chordoma; colon tumors; colorectal adenocarcinoma; eye tumors; posterior uveal melanoma, fibrogenesis imperfecta ossium, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; kidney tumors; chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, nephroblastoma (Wilms tumor), kidney; papillary renal cell carcinoma, primary renal ASPSCR1-TFE3 tumor, renal cell carcinoma; liver tumors; hepatoblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma; lung tumors: non-small cell carcinoma, small cell cancer; malignant melanoma of soft parts; nervous system tumors: medulloblastoma, meningioma, neuroblastoma, astrocytic tumors, ependymomas, peripheral nerve sheath tumors, phaeochromocytoma; ovarian tumors: epithelial tumors, germ cell tumors, sex cord-stromal tumors, pericytoma; pituitary adenomas; rhabdoid tumor skin tumors; cutaneous benign fibrous histiocytomas; smooth muscle tumors: intravenous leiomyomatosis; soft tissue tumors: liposarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, low grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (AFH), clear cell sarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, elastofibroma, Ewing's tumors, extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, lipoblastoma, lipoma/benign lipomatous tumors, liposarcoma/malignant lipomatous tumors, malignant myoepithelioma, rhabdomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, squamous cell cancer; tumors of the testis: germ cell tumors, spermatocytic seminoma; thyroid tumors: anaplastic (undifferentiated) carcinoma, oncocytic tumors, papillary carcinoma; uterus tumors: carcinoma of the cervix, endometrial carcinoma, leiomyoma etc.

In an important embodiment of the invention, the tumors to be treated are lung cancers, particularly non-small cell lung carcinoma's, e.g., Lewis lung carcinoma. The compounds administered are suitably mu-opioid antagonists, especially peripheral mu-opioid antagonists, such a methylnaltrexonc. Invasiveness assays as well as other known methods can assess anti-metastatic effects. As seen in the example below, cells of Lewis lung carcinoma were transplanted into the flanks of mice. The mice were administered methylnaltrexone via continuous infusion, and the results evidence that tumor growth was attenuated as was the appearance of micro-and micrometastases in the lungs. The reduction of tumor volume was statistically significant (P=0.009).

The opioid antagonists in accordance with the present invention include both centrally and peripherally acting opioid antagonists. It is contemplated that those antagonists of particular value are suitably the peripheral opioid antagonists. Especially suitable may be a mu-opioid antagonist, especially a peripheral mu-opioid antagonist. Opioid antagonists form a class of compounds that can vary in structure while maintaining the peripheral restrictive property. These compounds include tertiary and quaternary morphinans, in particular noroxymorphone derivatives, N-substituted piperidines, and in particular, piperidine-N-alkylcarboxylates, and tertiary and quaternary benzomorphans. Peripherally restricted antagonists, while varied in structure, are typically charged, polar and/or of high molecular weight, each of which impedes their crossing the blood-brain barrier.

Examples of opioid antagonists, which cross the blood-brain barrier and are centrally (and peripherally) active, include, e.g., naloxone, naltrexone (each of which is commercially available from Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.), nalmefene (available, e.g., from DuPont Pharma) nalbuine, nalorphine, cyclazocine, levallorphan, cyclorphan, oxilorphan, pentazocine and naloxonazine. These may be of value in attenuating angiogenesis in the central nervous system or in patients not being treated for pain management or other opioid treatment.

A peripheral opioid antagonist useful for the present invention may be a compound which is a quaternary morphinan derivative, and in particular, a quaternary noroxymorphone of formula (I):

wherein R is alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aryl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl or aryl-substituted alkyl, and X⁻ is the anion, especially a chloride, bromide, iodide or methylsulfate anion. The noroxymorphone derivatives of formula (1) can be prepared, for example, according to the procedure in U.S. Pat. No. 4,176,186, which is incorporated herein by reference: see also, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,719,215; 4,861,781; 5,102,887; 5,972,954 and 6,274,591, U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2002/0028825 and 2003/0022909; and PCT publication Nos. WO 99/22737 and WO 98/25613, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

A compound of formula (1) of particular value is N-methylnaltrexone (or simply methylnaltrexone), wherein R is cyclopropylmethyl as represented in formula (II):

wherein X⁻ is as described above. Methylnaltrexone is a quaternary derivative of the opioid antagonist naltrexone. Methylnaltrexone exists as a salt, and “methylnaltrexone” or “MNTX”, as used herein, therefore embraces salts. “Methylnaltrexone” or “MNTX” specifically includes, but is not limited to, bromide salts, chloride salts, iodide salts, carbonate salts, and sulfate salts of methylnaltrexone. Names used for the bromide salt of MNTX in the literature include: methylnaltrexone bromide; N-methylnaltrexone bromide; naltrexone methobromide; naltrexone methyl bromide; SC-37359, MRZ-2663-BR, and N-cyclopropylmethylnoroxy-morphine-methobromide. Methylnaltrexone is commercially available from, e.g., Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, St. Louis, Mo. Methylnaltrexone is provided as a white crystalline powder, freely soluble in water, typically as the bromide salt. The compound as provided is 99.4% pure by reverse phase HPLC, and contains less than 0.011% unquaternized naltrexone by the same method. Methylnaltrexone can be prepared as a sterile solution at a concentration of, e.g., about 5 mg/mL.

Other suitable peripheral opioid antagonists may include N-substituted piperidines, and in particular, piperidine-N-alkylcarboxylates as represented by formula (III):

wherein R¹ is hydrogen or alkyl; R² is hydrogen, alkyl, or alkenyl; R³ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl-substituted alkyl or aryl-substituted alkyl; R⁴ is hydrogen, alkyl, or alkenyl; A is OR⁵ or NR⁶R⁷; wherein R⁵ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl-substituted alkyl or aryl-substituted alkyl; R⁶ is hydrogen or alkyl; R⁷ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl-substituted alkyl or aryl-substituted alkyl, or alkylene-substituted B or together with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached, R¹ and R⁷ form a heterocyclic ring selected from pyrrole and piperidine; B is

wherein R⁸ is hydrogen or alkyl; R⁹ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl-substituted alkyl or aryl-substituted alkyl or together with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached, R8 and R9 form a heterocyclic ring selected from pyrrole and piperidine; W is OR¹⁰, NR¹¹R¹², or OE; wherein R¹⁰ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl-substituted alkenyl, or aryl-substituted alkyl; R¹¹ is hydrogen or alkyl: R¹² is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl-substituted alkyl, aryl-substituted alkyl or alkylene-substituted C(═O)Y or, together with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached, R¹¹ and R¹² form a heterocyclic ring selected from pyrrole and piperidine;

E is

alkylene-substituted (C=0)D, or —R¹³0C(═O)R¹⁴; wherein R¹³ is alkyl-substituted alkylene; R¹⁴ is alkyl; D is OR¹⁵ or NR¹⁶R¹⁷ wherein R¹⁵ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl substituted alkyl, or aryl-substituted alkyl; R¹⁶ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, aryl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl substituted alkyl or cycloalkenyl-substituted alkyl; R¹⁷ is hydrogen or alkyl or, together with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached, R¹⁶ and R¹⁷ form a heterocyclic ring selected from the group consisting of pyrrole or piperidine; Y is OR¹⁸ or NR¹⁹R²⁰; wherein R¹⁸ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl-substituted alkyl, or aryl-substituted alkyl; R¹⁹ is hydrogen or alkyl; R²⁰ is hydrogen, alkyl, alkenyl, aryl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkenyl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl, cycloalkenyl-substituted alkyl, or aryl-substituted alkyl or, together with the nitrogen atom to which they are attached, R¹⁹ and R²⁰ form a heterocyclic ring selected from pyrrole and piperidine: R²¹ is hydrogen or alkyl; and n is 0 to 4.

Particular piperidine-N-alkylcarbonylates which may be of value are N-alkylamino-3,4,4 substituted piperidines, such as alvimopan represented below as formula (IV):

Suitable N-substituted piperidines may be prepared as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,270,328; 6,451,806; 6,469,030, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Alvimopan is available from Adolor Corp., Exton, Pa. Such compounds have moderately high molecular weights, a zwitterion form and a polarity which prevent penetration of the blood-brain barrier.

Still other suitable peripheral opioid antagonist compounds may include quaternary benzomorphan compounds. The quaternary benzomorphan compounds employed in the methods of the present invention exhibit high levels of morphine antagonism, while exhibiting reduced, and preferably substantially no, agonist activity.

The quaternary benzomorphan compounds which may be employed in the methods of the present invention have the following formula (V):

wherein; R₁ is hydrogen, acyl or acetoxy; and R² is alkyl or alkenyl; R is alkyl, alkenyl or alkynyl and X— is an anion, especially a chloride, bromide, iodide or methyl sulfate anion.

Specific quaternary derivatives of benzomorphan compounds that may be employed in the methods of the present invention include the following compounds of formula (V): 2′-hydroxy 5,9-dimethyl-2,2-diallyl-6,7-benzomorphanium-bromide: 2′-hydroxy-5,9-dimethyl-2-n-propyl-2 allyl-6,7-benzomorphanium-bromide; 2′-hydroxy-5,9-dimethyl-2-n-propyl-2-propargy 1-6,7 benzomorphanium-bromide; and 2′-acetoxy-5,9-dimethyl-2-n-propyl-2-ally)-6.7 benzomorphanium-bromide.

Other quaternary benzomorphan compounds that may be employed in the methods of the present invention are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,723,440, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

Certain substituted morphinans are also envisioned as suitable for use in the methods in accordance with the invention. For example, 6-amino/peptide substituted morphinans such as, e.g., represented by formula (VI):

wherein R₃ is independently selected from the group consisting of:

-   -   (v) hydrogen;     -   (vi) aryl; substituted aryl; heteroaryl; substituted heteroaryl;     -   (vii) heterocyclic or substituted heterocyclic; and     -   (viii) —C₁-C₈ alkyl, —C₂-C₈ alkenyl, or —C₂-C₈ alkynyl each         containing 0, 1, 2, or 3 or more heteroatoms selected from O, S,         or N; substituted —C₁-C₈ alkyl, substituted —C₂-C₈ alkenyl, or         substituted —C₂-C₈ alkynyl each containing 0, 1, 2, or 3 or more         heteroatoms selected from O, S or N; —C₃-C₁₂ cycloalkyl, or         substituted —C₃-C₁₂ cycloalkyl; —C₃-C₁₂ cycloalkenyl, or         substituted —C₃-C₁₂ cycloalkenyl;         R₄ is hydrogen, OR_(a), or NR_(b)-Q¹-R_(c), where Q¹ is absent         or selected from (C═O) or (SO₂);         R₅ is selected from the group consisting of: hydrogen, halogen,         SR_(a), S(O)R_(a), SO₂R_(a), S(O)NR_(b)R_(c), SO₂NR_(b)R_(c),         NR_(b)-Q-R_(c), CN, (C═W)NR_(b)R_(c), C(O)OR_(a), CH₂OR_(a),         CH₂NR_(b)R_(c), heteroaryl, and substituted heteroaryl;         Y is hydrogen, lower alkyl, or lower alkoxy;         V₁, is C═O, SO₂, C₁-C₆ alkylene, substituted alkylene, C₂-C₆,         alkenylene, C₂-C₆ alkynylene; V₂ is absent, alkylene,         substituted alkylene, C₂-C₆ alkenylene, C₂-C₆ alkynylene;         heterocyclic, heteroaryl, aryl or C═O; V₃ is absent, alkylene,         substituted alkylene, C₂-C₆ alkenylene, C₂-C₆ alkynylene;         heterocyclic, heteroaryl, aryl or C═O; V₄ is absent, alkylene,         substituted alkylene, C₂-C₆ alkenylene, C₂-C₆ alkynylene;         heterocyclic, heteroaryl, aryl or C═O;         n is 1, 2, 3 or 4; wherein each repeating unit can be the same         or different;         Z is hydrogen, NR_(b)R_(c), (C═W)NR_(b)R_(c),         NR_(a)(C═W)NR_(b)R_(c), (C—(W)OH, C(O)NHOH, heteroaryl, or         substituted heteroaryl;         alternatively,

can be selected from the group consisting of natural or unnatural amino acids and peptidomimetics; and

denotes a carbon-carbon single or double bond.

Other 6-substituted morphinans are disclosed in U.S. Published Application 2009/0209569, incorporated herein by reference.

Also contemplated as useful peripheral opioid antagonists are polymerically conjugate opioid antagonists such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,056,500, incorporated herein reference, having a genealogical structure of formula (VII):

POLY-Y-A_(o)  (VII)

wherein POLY is a water soluble, non-peptidic polymer, X is a linkage, preferably a hydrolytically stable linkage covalently attaching the polymer to the opioid antagonist, and A_(o) is the opioid antagonist, and has a structure, for example, of formula (VIII):

wherein: Y is C₁-C₆ alkyl, substituted C₁-C₆ alkyl, C₃-C₆ cycloalkyl, substituted C₁-C₆ cycloalkyl, C₂-C₆ alkenyl, substituted C₂-C₆ alkynyl, aryl, substituted aryl, heteroaryl, substituted heteroaryl, heterocycle, and substituted heterocycle;

Z is H or OH;

the dashed line indicates an optional double bond; and X and POLY are as defined above.

It is understood that for all opioid antagonists illustrated as useful in the methods in accordance with the invention, their geometric isomers, enantiomers, diastereomers, racemates, pharmaceutically acceptable salts, prodrugs and solvates are also contemplated as described herein.

The compounds employed in the methods of the present invention may exist in prodrug form. As used herein, “prodrug” is intended to include any covalently bonded carriers which release the active parent drug according to formulas (I) to (VIII) or other formulas or compounds employed in the methods of the present invention in vivo when such prodrug is administered to a mammalian subject. Since prodrugs are known to enhance numerous desirable qualities of pharmaceuticals (e.g., solubility, bioavailability, manufacturing, etc.), the compounds employed in the present methods may, if desired, be delivered in prodrug form. Thus, the present invention contemplates methods of delivering prodrugs. Prodrugs of the compounds employed in the present invention may be prepared by modifying functional groups present in the compound in such a way that the modifications are cleaved, either in routine manipulation or in vivo, to the parent compound.

Accordingly, prodrugs include, for example, compounds described herein in which a hydroxy, amino, or carboxy group is bonded to any group that, when the prodrug is administered to a mammalian subject, cleaves to form a free hydroxyl, free amino, or carboxylic acid, respectively.

Examples include, but are not limited to, acetate, formate and benzoate derivatives of alcohol and amine functional groups; and alkyl, carbocyclic, aryl, and alkylaryl esters such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, iso-propyl, butyl, isobutyl, sec-butyl, tert-butyl, cyclopropyl, phenyl, benzyl, and phenethyl esters, and the like.

As noted, the compounds employed in the methods of the present invention may be prepared in a number of ways well known to those skilled in the art. All preparations disclosed in association with the present invention are contemplated to be practiced on any scale, including milligram, gram, multi gram, kilogram, multikilogram or commercial pharmaceutical scale.

Compounds employed in the present methods may contain one or more asymmetrically substituted carbon atom, and may be isolated in optically active or racemic form. Thus, all chiral, diastereomeric, racemic form, epimeric form and all geometric isomeric form of a structure are intended, unless the specific stereochemistry or isomeric form is specifically indicated. It is well known in the art how to prepare and isolate such optically active form. For example, mixtures of stereoisomers may be separated by standard techniques including, but not limited to, resolution of racemic form, normal, reverse-phase, and chiral chromatography, preferential salt formation, recrystallization, and the like, or by chiral synthesis either from chiral starting materials or by deliberate synthesis of target chiral centers.

In some embodiments of the invention, the opioid antagonist may be a mu-opioid antagonist (MOR antagonist). In other embodiments, the opioid antagonist may be a kappa opioid antagonist. The invention also encompasses administration of more than one opioid antagonist, including combinations of mu antagonists, combinations of kappa antagonists and combinations of mu and kappa antagonists, for example, a combination of methylnaltrexone and alvimopan.

The methods of the present invention encompass providing a therapeutic or prophylactic role in other endothelial-based diseases, e.g., in a variety of angiogenesis and/or proliferation-related neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases, e.g., sickle cell disease, neovascular disease of the eye (such as diabetic retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, retinopathy of prematurity, age-related macular degeneration), endothelial proliferation in the kidneys or lung and psoriasis. Non-neoplastic conditions that are amenable to treatment include rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, atherosclerosis, diabetic and other proliferative retinopathies including retinopathy of prematurity, retrolental fibroplasia, neovascular glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, thyroid hyperplasias (including Grave's disease), corneal and other tissue transplantation, chronic inflammation, lung inflammation, nephrotic syndrome, preeclampsia, ascites, pericardial effusion (such as that associated with pericarditis), and pleural effusion. For example, it has been shown that morphine induced proliferative retinopathy in sickle cell disease (Gupta et al., personal communication). It is anticipated that treatment with an opioid antagonist may significantly inhibit the retinopathy, particularly with opioid-induced retinopathy in sickle cell patients that are in active opioid therapy, and receive opioids for long periods of time, including chronic therapy for weeks, months or even years.

The methods of the present invention are also envisioned to be of value in reducing the risk of recurrence of a malignancy or neoplasm after treatment with other therapeutic modalities, e.g., after surgical intervention. For example, embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide methods for reducing the risk of recurrence of postoperative cancer. The cancers may include, for example, lung cancer, breast cancer or prostate cancer, and reduced risk may be achieved by providing to the patient suffering from such cancer an effective amount of an opioid antagonist, particularly a peripheral opioid antagonist. For example, patients undergoing breast cancer surgery had a significant difference (fourfold) in the incidence of recurrence at 2-4 years depending on whether the patients received regional or general anesthesia (with morphine during their initial surgery). Co-administration of the opioid antagonists, especially peripheral antagonist (described herein), in accordance with the present invention with surgical treatment may be of value to reduce the incidence of recurrence of the cancer.

It is also contemplated that the invention provides a method of inhibiting the activity of VEGF by providing to the affected cells or subject an effective amount of an opioid antagonist under conditions sufficient to inhibit VEGF-induced angiogenesis. In other words, the compounds in accordance with embodiments of the present invention have VEGF-inhibitory or antagonist activity.

As also shown in the examples below, it has further been found that a peripheral opioid antagonist, MNTX, attenuates not only VEGF-induced endothelial cell migration, but also induction of endothelial migration and/or proliferation by other pro-migration, pro-proliferative factors such as platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), or sphingosine-1-phosphate (SIP). Such attenuation ranges from about 10% to 60%, and provides further evidence that the methods in accordance with the present invention have value in inhibiting pro-migration, pro-angiogenic factors.

Embodiments of the invention also encompass methods of treating patients, e.g., cancer patients, who are undergoing treatment with opioid agonists. Opioid agonists include, but are not limited to, morphine, methadone, codeine, meperidine, fentidine, fentanil, sufentanil, alfentanil and the like. As described above, opioid agonists are classified by their ability to agonize one type of receptor an order of magnitude more effectively than another. For example, the relative affinity of morphine for the mu receptor is 200 times greater than for the kappa receptor, and is therefore classified as a mu-opioid agonist. Some opioid agonists may act as agonists towards one receptor and antagonists toward another receptor and are classified as agonistiantagonists, (also known as mixed or partial agonists). “Agonistantagonist,” “partial agonist,” and “mixed agonist” are used interchangeably herein. These opioids include, but are not limited to, pentazocine, butorphanol, nalorphine, nalbufine, buprenorphine, bremazocine, and bezocine. Many of the agonist/antagonist group of opioids are agonists at the kappa receptors and antagonists at the mu receptors. Further, it is envisioned the active metabolites of opioid agonists may also be active as angiogenesis inducers. For example, the metabolites of morphine, morphine 3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine 6-glucuronide (M6G) may be active pro-angiogenic factors.

Generally, the peripheral opioid antagonists in accordance with the present invention may be administered in an effective amount such that the patient's plasma level of a peripheral opioid antagonist is in the range from 10⁻⁶ M to 10⁻⁹ M. Patient drug plasma levels may be measured using routine HPLC methods known to those of skill in the art.

As described in the examples below, the enkephalin analog DAMGO induces endothelial migration. Thus, the methods in accordance with the present invention may be of value to patient suffering from angiogenic-related or hyperproliferative diseases, e.g., cancer, quite apart from treatment with opioid agonists.

The particular mode of administration of the opioid antagonist selected will depend, of course, upon the particular combination of drugs selected, the severity of the tumor progression being treated, in the cancer patient, the general health condition of the patient, and the dosage required for therapeutic efficacy. The methods of this invention, generally speaking, may be practiced using any mode of administration that is medically acceptable, e.g., any mode that produces effective levels of the active compounds without causing clinically unacceptable adverse effects.

Such modes of administration include oral, rectal, topical (as by powder, ointment, drops, trans dermal patch or iontophoretic devise), transdermal, sublingual, intramuscular, infusion, intravenous, pulmonary, intramuscular, intracavity, as an aerosol, aural (e.g., via eardrops), intranasal, inhalation, intraocular or subcutaneous. Direct injection, i.e., intratumoral injection, could also be used for local delivery and provide sufficiently high concentrations of antagonist at the tumor site. Intratumoral implants may also be used for sustained, local delivery of antagonist at the tumor site. Oral or subcutaneous administration may be suitable for prophylactic or long term treatment because of the convenience of the patient as well as the dosing schedule. For ocular diseases, ophthalmic formulations may be injected or instilled directly. Of particular value is continuous infusion, e.g., via implant, a sustained release delivery system or continuous local injection.

Additionally, the opioid antagonists may be administered as an enterically coated tablet or capsule. In some embodiments, the opioid antagonist is administered by a slow infusion method or by a time-release or controlled-release method or as a lyophilized powder.

When administered, the compounds of the invention are given in pharmaceutically acceptable amounts and in pharmaceutically acceptable compositions or preparations. Such preparations may routinely contain salts, buffering agents, preservatives, and optionally other therapeutic ingredients. When used in medicine, the salts should be pharmaceutically acceptable, but non-pharmaceutically acceptable salts may conveniently be used to prepare pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof and are not excluded from the scope of the invention. Such pharmacologically and pharmaceutically acceptable salts include, but are not limited to those prepared from the following acids: hydrochloric, hydrobromic, sulfuric, nitric, phosphoric, maleic, acetic, salicylic, p-toluenesulfonic, tartaric, citric, methanesulfonic, formic, succinic, naphthalene-2-sulfonic, pamoic, 3-hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylic, and benzene sulfonic. Suitable buffering agents include, but are not limited to, acetic acid and salts thereof (1-2% WN); citric acid and salts thereof (1-3% WN); boric acid and salts thereof (0.5-2.5% WN); and phosphoric acid and salts thereof (0.8-2% WN).

Suitable preservatives include, but are not limited to, benzalkonium chloride (0.003-0.03% WN); chlorobutanol (0.3-0.9% WIN); parabens (0.01-0.25% WN) and thimerosal (0.004-0.02% WN).

For ease of administration, a pharmaceutical composition of opioid antagonists may also contain one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, such as lubricants, diluents, binders, carriers, and disintegrants. Other auxiliary agents may include, e.g., stabilizers, wetting agents, emulsifiers, salts for influencing osmotic pressure, coloring, flavoring and/or aromatic active compounds.

A pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or excipient refers to a non-toxic solid, semi-solid or liquid filler, diluent, encapsulating material or formulation auxiliary of any type. For example, suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, diluents, solvents or vehicles include, but are not limited to, water, salt (buffer) solutions, alcohols, gum arabic, mineral and vegetable oils, benzyl alcohols, polyethylene glycols, gelatin, carbohydrates such as lactose, amylose or starch, magnesium stearate, talc, silicic acid, viscous paraffin, vegetable oils, fatty acid mono glycerides and diglycerides, pentaerythritol fatty acid esters, hydroxy methylcellulose, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, etc. Proper fluidity may be maintained, for example, by the use of coating materials such as lecithin, by the maintenance of the required particle size in the case of dispersions and by the use of surfactants. Prevention of the action of microorganisms may be ensured by the inclusion of various antibacterial and antifungal agents such as paraben, chlorobutanol, phenol, sorbic acid and the like.

If a pharmaceutically acceptable solid carrier is used, the dosage form may be tablets, capsules, powders, suppositories, or lozenges. If a liquid carrier is used, soft gelatin capsules, transdermal patches, aerosol sprays, topical cream, syrups or liquid suspensions, emulsions or solutions may be the dosage form.

For parental application, particularly suitable are injectable, sterile solutions, preferably nonaqueous or aqueous solutions, as well as dispersions, suspensions, emulsions, or implants, including suppositories. Ampoules are often convenient unit dosages. Injectable depot form may also be suitable and may be made by forming microencapsule matrices of the drug in biodegradable polymers such as polylactide-polyglycolide, poly(orthoesters) and poly(anhydrides). Depending upon the ratio of drug to polymer and the nature of the particular polymer employed, the rate of drug release can be controlled.

Depot injectable formulations are also prepared by entrapping the drug in liposomes or microemulsions which are compatible with body tissues. The injectable formulations may be sterilized, for example, by filtration through a bacterial-retaining filter or by incorporating sterilizing agents in the form of sterile solid compositions which can be dissolved or dispersed in sterile water or other sterile injectable media just prior to use.

For enteral application, particularly suitable are tablets, dragees, liquids, drops, suppositories, or capsules such as soft gelatin capsules. A syrup, elixir, or the like can be used wherein a sweetened vehicle is employed.

As noted, other delivery systems may include time-release, delayed-release or sustained-release delivery system. Such systems can avoid repeated administrations of the compounds of the invention, increasing convenience to the patient and the physician and maintain sustained plasma levels of compounds. Many types of controlled-release delivery system are available and known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Sustained or controlled-release compositions can be formulated, e.g., as liposomes or those wherein the active compound is protected with differentially degradable coatings, such as by microencapsulation, multiple coatings, etc.

For example, compounds of this invention may be combined with pharmaceutically acceptable sustained-release matrices, such as biodegradable polymers, to form therapeutic compositions. A sustained-release matrix, as used herein, is a matrix made of materials, usually polymers, which are degradable by enzymatic or acid-base hydrolysis or by dissolution. Once inserted into the body, the matrix is acted upon by enzymes and body fluids. A sustained-release matrix may be desirably chosen from biocompatible materials such as liposomes, polymer-based system such as polylactides (polylactic acid), polyglycolide (polymer of glycolic acid), polylactide co-glycolide (copolymers oflactic acid and glycolic acid), polyanhydrides, poly(ortho)esters, polysaccharides, polyamino acids, hyaluronic acid, collagen, chondroitin sulfate, polynucleotides, polyvinyl propylene, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, and silicone: nonpolymer system such as carboxylic acids, fatty acids, phospholipids, amino acids, lipids such as sterols, hydrogel release system; silastic system; peptide-based system; implants and the like. Specific examples include, but are not limited to: (a) erosional system in which the polysaccharide is contained in a form within a matrix, found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,452,775, 4,675,189, and 5,736,152 (herein incorporated by reference in their entireties), and (b) diffusional system in which an active component permeates at a controlled rate from a polymer such as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,854,480, 5,133,974 and 5,407,686 (herein incorporated by reference in their entireties). In addition, pump-based hard-wired delivery system can be used, some of which are adapted for implantation. Suitable enteric coatings are described in PCT publication No. WO 98/25613 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,274,591, both incorporated herein by reference.

Use of a long-term, sustained-release implant may be particularly suitable for maintaining suitable drug levels. “Long-term” release, as used herein, means that the implant is constructed and arranged to deliver therapeutic levels of the active ingredient for at least 7 days, and suitably 30 to 60 days. Long-term sustained-release implants are well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art and include some of the release system described above.

For topical application, there are employed as nonsprayable form, viscous to semi-solid or solid form comprising a carrier compatible with topical application and having a dynamic viscosity preferably greater than water. Suitable formulations include, but are not limited to, solutions, suspensions, emulsions, cream, ointments, powders, liniments, salves, aerosols, etc., which are, if desired, sterilized or mixed with auxiliary agents, e.g., preservatives, etc.

Transdermal or iontophoretic delivery of pharmaceutical compositions of the peripheral opioid antagonists is also possible.

Respecting MNTX specifically, aqueous formulations may include a chelating agent, a buffering agent, an anti-oxidant and, optionally, an isotonicity agent, preferably pH adjusted to between 3.0 and 3.5. Suitable formulations that are stable to autoclaving and long term storage are described in application Ser. No. 10/821,811, now published as 20040266806, entitled “Pharmaceutical Formulation,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.

In one embodiment, compounds of the invention are administered in a dosing regimen which provides continuous dosing of the compound to a subject, e.g. a regimen that maintains minimum plasma levels of the opioid antagonist, and preferably eliminates the spikes and troughs of a drug level with conventional regimens. Suitably, a continuous dose may be achieved by administering the compound to a subject on a daily basis using any of the delivery methods disclosed herein. In one embodiment, the continuous dose may be achieved using continuous infusion to the subject, or via a mechanism that facilitates the release of the compound over time, for example, a transdermal patch, or a sustained release formulation. Suitably, compounds of the invention are continuously released to the subject in amounts sufficient to maintain a concentration of the compound in the plasma of the subject effective to inhibit or reduce opioid induced angiogenesis; or in cancer patients, to attenuate growth of a tumor. Compounds in accordance with the present invention, whether provided alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents (as described hereinbelow), are provided in an antiangiogenic effective amount. It will be understood, however, that the total daily usage of the compounds and compositions in accordance with the present invention will be decided by the attending physician within the scope of sound medical judgment. The specific therapeutically effective dose level for any particular patient will depend upon a variety of factors including the disorder being treated and the severity of the disorder; activity of the specific compound employed; the specific composition employed; the age, body weight, general health, sex and diet of the patient; the time of administration; the route of administration; the rate of excretion of the specific compound employed; the duration of the treatment; drugs used in combination or coincidental with the specific compound employed and like factors well known in the medical arts. For example, it is well within the level of ordinary skill in the art to start doses of the compound at levels lower than those required to achieve the desired therapeutic effect and to gradually increase the dosage until the desired effect is achieved.

If desired, the effective daily dose may be divided into multiple doses for purposes of administration. Consequently, single dose compositions may contain such amounts or submultiples thereof to make up the daily dose. As noted, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily optimize effective doses and co-administration regimens (as described herein) as determined by good medical practice and the clinical condition of the individual patient.

Generally, oral doses of the opioid antagonists, particularly peripheral antagonists, will range from about 0.01 to about 80 mg/kg body weight per day. It is expected that oral doses in the range from 1 to 20 mg/kg body weight will yield the desired results. Generally, parenteral administration, including intravenous and subcutaneous administration, will range from about 0.001 to 5 mg/kg body weight. It is expected that doses ranging from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg body weight will yield the desired results. Dosage may be adjusted appropriately to achieve desired drug levels, local or systemic, depending on the mode of administration. For example, it is expected that the dosage for oral administration of the opioid antagonists in an enteric ally coated formulation would be from 10 to 30% of the non-coated oral dose. In the event that the response in a patient is insufficient of such doses, even higher doses (or effectively higher dosage by a different, more localized delivery route) may be employed to the extent that the patient tolerance permits. Multiple doses per day are contemplated to achieve appropriate systemic levels of compounds. Appropriate system levels can be determined by, for example, measurement of the patient's plasma level of the drug using routine HPLC methods known to these of skill in the art.

In some embodiments of the invention, the opioid antagonists are co-administered with other therapeutic agents, including opioids. The term “co-administration” is meant to refer to a combination therapy by any administration route in which two or more agents are administered to a patient or subject. Co-administration of agents may also be referred to as combination therapy or combination treatment. The agents may be in the same dosage formulations or separate formulations. For combination treatment with more than one active agent, where the active agents are in separate dosage formulations, the active agents can be administered concurrently, or they each can be administered at separately staggered times. That is, agents may be administered simultaneously or sequentially (e.g., one agent may directly follow administration of the other or the agents may be give episodically, e.g., one can be given at one time followed by the other at a later time, e.g., within a week), as long as they are given in a manner sufficient to allow both agents to achieve effective concentrations in the body. The agents may also be administered by different routes, e.g., one agent may be administered intravenously while a second agent is administered intramuscularly, intravenously or orally. In other words, the co-administration of the opioid antagonist compound in accordance with the present invention with another agent is suitably considered a combined pharmaceutical preparation which contains an opioid antagonist and a another agent, the preparation being adapted for the administration of the peripheral opioid antagonist on a daily or intermittent basis, and the administration of the agent on a daily or intermittent basis. Thus, the opioid antagonists may be administered prior to concomitant with, or after administration of therapeutic agents. Co-administrable agents also may be formulated as an admixture, as, for example, in a single formulation or single tablet. These formulations may be parenteral or oral, such as the formulations described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,277,384; 6,261,599; 5,958,452 and PCT publication No. WO 98/25613, each hereby incorporated by reference.

It is further contemplated that embodiments of the present methods can be used alone or in conjunction with other treatments to control the growth or migration of endothelial cells in connection with the various conditions described above. The peripheral opioid antagonist may be co-administered with another therapeutic agent that is not an opioid or another opioid antagonist. Such suitable s therapeutic agents include anticancer agents, e.g., chemotherapeutic agents, radiotherapy, or other antiangiogenic agents such as suramin, or anti-VEGF mab, an endostatin or radiotherapy. It is envisioned that the opioid antagonists in accordance with the present invention are of particular value when co-administered with those agents that inhibit VEGF activity, e.g., anti-VEGF mab. The anti-VEGF antibodies are useful in the treatment of various neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases and disorders, including endometrial hyperplasia, endometriosis, abnormal vascular proliferation associated with phakomatoses, edema (such as that associated with brain tumors and Meigs' syndrome. One example of a anti-VEGF mab is bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,884,879 and WO94/10202 hereby incorporated in their entirety. In a certain embodiments of the invention. MNTX is co-administered with Avastin.

In other words, the compounds of the present invention may also be useful for the treatment of cancer in patients, as described above, either when used alone or in combination with one or more other anticancer agents, e.g., radiotherapy and/or other chemotherapeutic, including antiangiogenic, treatments conventionally administered to patients for treating cancer. The main categories and examples of such drugs are listed herein and include, but are not limited to, metalloproatease inhibitors, inhibitors of endothelial cell proliferation/migration, antagonists of angiogenic growth factors, inhibitors of Integrin/Survival signaling, and chelators of copper.

In certain embodiments the compounds of the invention can be combined with known combinations of anticancer agents. The compounds of the invention can be combined with an antiangiogenic agent and a chemotherapeutic agent and administered to a cancer patient. For example, MNTX can be administered to cancer patients in combination with Avastin and 5-fluorouracil.

In one embodiment of the invention, the tumors are prostate cancer, gastrointestinal tumors such as colon or pancreatic cancer and the compounds of the invention are co-administered with other anticancer agents as described herein.

It is anticipated that the opioid antagonists co-administered with various anticancer drugs, radiotherapy or other antiangiogenic drugs can give rise to a significantly enhanced antiproliferative effect on cancerous cells, and thus providing an increased therapeutic effect, e.g., employing peripheral opioid antagonists to certain tumors can potentiate their response to other therapeutic regimens. Specifically, a significantly increased antiangiogenic or antihyperproliferative effect may be obtained with the above disclosed co-administered combinations, even if utilizing lower concentrations of the anticancer agent, a lower dosing of radiation, or other antiangiogenic drugs compared to the treatment regimes in which the drugs or radiation are used alone. Therefore, there is the potential to provide therapy wherein adverse side effects associated with anticancer drugs, antiangiogenic drugs or radiotherapy are considerably reduced than normally observed with the anticancer drugs, antiangiogenic drugs or radiotherapy used alone in larger doses. For example, co-administration of an opioid antagonist in accordance with the present invention with an anti-VEGF agent, e.g., anti-VEGF mab, may reduce the dose of the anti-VEGF agent or increase potency or efficacy or both. Further, as detailed herein, the co-administration of an opioid antagonist in accordance with the present invention with other anticancer modalities may have prophylactic value.

When used in the treatment of hyperproliferative diseases, for example, compounds in accordance with the present invention may be co-administered with metalloprotease inhibitors such as for example: Marimastat, synthetic matrix metalloprotease inhibitor (MMPI), British Biotech; Bay 12-9566, synthetic MMPI and inhibitor tumor growth, Bayer; AG3340, synthetic MMPI, Agouron/Warner-Lambert; CGS 27023A, synthetic MMPI, Novartis; CGS 27023A, Synthetic MMPI; COL-3, synthetic MMPI, tetracycline derivative, Collagenex; AE-941 (Neovastat), naturally occurring MMPI, AEtema, BMS-275291, synthetic MMPI, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Penicillamine, urokinase inhibitor, NCI-NABTT.

Also, when used in the treatment of hyperproliferative diseases, compounds in accordance with the present invention may be co-administered with direct inhibitors of endothelial cell proliferation/migration such as: TNP-470 (fumagillin derivative), inhibits endothelial cell growth, TAP Pharmaceuticals; Squalamine, inhibits sodium-hydrogen exchanger, NIHE3, Magainin; Combretastatin, induction of apoptosis in proliferating endothelial cells, Oxigene; Endostatin, inhibition of endothelial cells, EntreMed; Penicillamine, blocks endothelial cell migration and proliferation, NCI-NABTT: Famesyl Transferase Inhibitor (FTI), blocks endothelial cell migration and proliferation, NCI-NABTT, −L-778,123 Merck, −SCH66336 Schering-Plough, −R115777 Janssen.

When used in the treatment of hyperproliferative diseases, compounds in accordance with the present invention may also be co-administered with antagonists of angiogenic growth factors such as: anti-VEGF antibody, a monoclonal antibody that inactivates VEGF, Genentech; thalidomide, blocks activity of angiogenic growth factors (bFGF, VEGF, TNF-alpha), Celgene; SU5416, blocks VEGF receptor (Flk-1/KDR) signaling (tyrosine kinase), Sugen-NCI; ribozyme (Angiozyme), attenuates mRNA of VEGF receptors, Ribozyme Pharmaceuticals, Inc: SU6668, blocks VEGF, bFGF, and PDGF receptor signaling, Sugen; PTK787/ZK22584, blocks VEGF receptor signaling, Novartis: Interferon-alpha, inhibition of bFGF and VEGF production; Suramin, blocks binding of growth factor to its receptor, NCI-NABTT.

When used in the treatment of hyperproliferative diseases, compounds of the present invention may also be co-administered with drugs that inhibit endothelial-specific Integrin/Survival signaling: Vitaxin, antibody to alpha-v-beta3 integrin present on endothelial cell surface, Ixsys; EMD121974, small molecule blocker of integrin present on endothelial cell surface, Merck KGaA.

When used in the treatment of hyperproliferative diseases, compounds of the present invention may be co-administered with chelators of copper, such as: penicillamine, sulfhydryl group binds copper; clears copper through urinary excretion, NCI-NABTT; tetrathiomolybdate, thiol groups tightly bind copper, inactivate copper available to tumor. University of Michigan Cancer Center, captopril, chelates copper and zinc, also, inhibitor of MMP and angiotensin converting enzyme, Northwestern University.

When used in the treatment of hyperproliferative diseases, compounds of the present invention may be co-administered with angiogenesis antagonists with distinct mechanisms: CAI, inhibitor of calcium influx. NCI: ABT-627, endothelin receptor antagonist. Abbott, NCI; CM101/ZDO101, group B Strep toxin that selectively disrupts proliferating endothelium by interaction with the (CM201) receptor, CarboMed/Zeneca; Interleukin-12, induction of interferon-gamma, down-regulation of IL-10, induction of IP-10, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center/Temple University, Temple University, Genetics Institute, Hoffman LaRoche; IM862, blocks production of VEGF and bFGF; increases production of the inhibitor IL-12, Cytran; PNU-145156E, blocks angiogenesis induced by Tat protein, Pharmacia and Upjohn.

When used in the treatment of hyperproliferative diseases, compounds of the present invention may be co-administered with chemotherapeutic agents such as, for example, alpha interferon. COMP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, methotrexate and prednisone), etoposide, mBACOD (methortrexate, bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and dexamethasone), PRO-MACE/MOPP (prednisone, methotrexate (w/leucovin rescue), doxorubicin; cyclophosphamide, paclitaxol, docetaxol, etoposide/mechlorethamine, vincristine, prednisone and procarbazine), vincristine, vinblastine, angioinhibins, TNP-470, pentosan polysulfate, platelet factor 4, angiostatin, LM-609. SU-101, CM-101, Techgalan, thalidomide. SP-PG and the like.

Anticancer agents which may be co-administered with compounds in accordance with the present invention also suitably include antimetabolites (e.g., 5-fluoro-uracil, methotrexate, fludarabine), antimicrotubule agents (e.g., vincristine, vinblastine, taxanes such as paclitaxel, docetaxel), an alkylating agent (e.g., cyclophosphamide, melphalan, biochoroethylnitrosurea, hydroxyurea), nitrogen mustards, (e.g., mechloethamine, melphan, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide and Ifosfamide); nitrosoureas (e.g., carmustine, lomustine, semustine and streptozocin); platinum agents (e.g., cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin, JM-216, CI-973), anthracyclines (e.g., doxrubicin, daunorubicin), antibiotics (e.g., mitomycin, idarubicin, adriamycin, daunomycin), topoisomerase inhibitors (e.g., etoposide, camptothecins), alkyl sulfonates including busulfan; triazines (e.g., dacarbazine): ethyenimines (e.g., thiotepa and hexamethylmelamine); folic acid analogs (e.g., methotrexate); pyrimidine analogues (e.g., 5 fluorouracil, cytosine arabinoside); purine analogs (e.g., 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine); antitumor antibiotics (e.g., actinomycin D; bleomycin, mitomycin C and methramycin); hormones and hormone antagonists (e.g., tamoxifen, cortiosteroids) and any other cytotoxic agents, (e.g. estramustine phosphate, prednimustine).

It will be understood that agents which can be combined with the compounds of the present invention for the inhibition, treatment or prophylaxis of angiogenesis and/or cancers are not limited to those listed above, but include, in principle, any agents useful for the treatment of opioid-induced and non-opioid-induced angiogenic diseases, tumor growth and metastasis inhibition.

It has also been understood that malignant cells often differ from normal cells by a differential expression of one or more proteins. Overexpression of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) has been observed in lung cancers (Madar I, Bencherif B, Lever J, et al: Imaging delta- and mu-opioid receptors in PET in lung carcinoma patients. J. Nucl. Med. 48, 207-213 (2007)). In the examples below, the inventors found an approximately five-fold increase in MOR expression was found in Lewis lung carcinoma cells.

It is contemplated that individuals with a specific MOR expression or stage of disease may respond differently to a given treatment than individuals lacking MOR expression. MOR can be an index to the therapeutic efficacy of opioid antagonists in accordance with the invention, i.e., the expression level and activity of this receptor protein can vary depending on the effect of the opioid antagonist thereto. Such information thus can provide for the personalization of diagnosis and treatment.

Because MORs are differentially expressed in cancer cells in comparison to normal cells, embodiments of the invention provide methods for diagnosing and monitoring cancers, using the expression level of MORs. That is, the expression level of MOR, may be used for predicting or determining the pharmacological efficacy of an opioid antagonist. Accordingly, the invention provides methods for assessing the responsiveness of a cancer to an opioid antagonist by detecting the presence, or levels of, a MOR in a biological sample such as tissues, cells and biological fluids isolated from a subject.

Specifically, embodiments of methods of the invention for diagnosing or detecting a cancer in a subject include determining the level of MOR in a test sample from said subject, and comparing the differential level of the MOR in the sample relative to the level in a control sample from a healthy subject, or the level established for a healthy subject, is indicative of the disease.

Embodiments of the invention may also be suitable as methods of monitoring the disease progression or the treatment progress.

The expression level of MORs (or nucleic acids encoding MOR) in a test sample can be compared to a normal, standard or control level in control samples, wherein the levels of control samples are obtained either from control cell lines which may be identified as high, medium or low MOR expression levels, or normal tissue or body fluids from a healthy subject.

Expression levels in normal and diseased tissues, cells or samples may be measured by various methods, for example, the expression level may be determined by measuring the amount by mass of the protein produced, according to a western blotting method or an ELISA method or by the use of a protein chip, or by photometric means, and the MOR as it is expressed in a subject sample is compared with the standard values. MOR expression can be correlated with tumor reduction in the presence of opioid antagonists, i.e., expression levels may be used to evaluate treatment efficacy.

Such methods of the invention may also be suitable for other cancers, such as, colon, prostate, ovarian, breast, bladder renal, hepatocellular, pharyngeal, and gastric cancers.

The present invention is further explained by the following examples, which should not be construed by way of limiting the scope of the present invention.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Endothelial Cell Migration Assay

The antiangiogenic activity of the peripheral opioid antagonists in accordance with the present invention was evaluated in experiments testing the ability of the antagonist to inhibit or modulation capillary endothelial cell migration using a modified Boyden chamber.

The endothelial cell migration assay was performed as described by Lingen, M. W., Methods in Molecular Medicine, 78: 337-347 (2003), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. Briefly, Human Microvascular Endothelial Cells (HMVEC) (Cell Systems, Kirkland, Wash.) were starved overnight in Endothelial Growth Medium (EGM) containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Cells were then trypsinized and resuspended in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DME) with 0.1% BSA at a concentration of 1×10⁶ cells/mL. Cells were added to the bottom of a 48-well modified Boyden chamber (NeuroPore Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif.). The chamber was assembled and inverted, and cells were allowed to attach for 2 hours at 37° C. to polycarbonate chemotaxis membranes (5 μm pore size) (NeuroProbe) that had been soaked in 0.1% gelatin overnight and dried. The chamber was then reinverted and the compound to be tested at varying concentrations in quadruple, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (as a positive control) or vehicle were added to the wells of the upper chamber (to a total volume of 50 mL); the apparatus was then incubated for 4 hours at 37° C. Membranes were recovered, fixed and stained (DiffQuick, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) and the number of cells that had migrated to the upper chamber per 10 high power fields were counted. Background migration to DME+0.1% BSA was subtracted and the data reported as the number of cells migrated per 10 high power fields (400 times). Each substance was tested in quadruplicate in each experiment, and all experiments were repeated to least twice. VEGF (R&D System, Minneapolis, Minn.) was used as a positive control at a concentration of 200 pg/mL. The optimal concentration for VEGF was determined previously by dose-response experiments (data not shown). The compounds tested as described above were morphine, naloxone, methylnaltrexone, and the combination of methylnaltrexone and morphine. The concentrations of each tested substance ranged for 0.001 to 10.0 μM. The concentration of the morphine was constant at 0.1 μM. The results are shown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 1 shows that morphine increased migration in a concentration-dependent manner The co-addition of methylnaltrexone and morphine, however, decreased migration in a concentration-dependent manner. Neither methylnaltrexone or naloxone alone affected migration.

Example 2 Endothelial Cell Migration Assay

Another set of experiments was conducted in accordance with the procedure described in Example 1. In this set of experiments, methylnaltrexone and the combination of methylnaltrexone and morphine was again tested for ability to inhibit endothelial cell migration. The methylnaltrexone concentrations when tested alone varied from 0.001 to 10.0 μM. In combination, the concentrations of methylnaltrexone varied from 0.001 to 10.0 μM, while the morphine concentration remained constant at 0.1 μM as described in Example 1. The results are shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 2 shows the combination of methylnaltrexone and morphine decreased migration in a concentration-dependent manner, while methylnaltrexone alone did not affect migration.

Example 3 Endothelial Cell Migration Induced by DAMGO

The drugs used in this study were [D-Ala 2, N-McPhe4, Gly5-ol]enkephalin or DAMGO (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.): naloxone (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.); N-methylnaltrexone bromide or methylnaltrexone (Mallinckrodt Specialty Chemicals, Phillipsburg, N.J.). The endothelial cell migration assay was performed as previously described (9). Human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (Cell Systems, Kirkland, W A) were starved overnight in media containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), harvested, resuspended into Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's media (DME) with 0.1% BSA, and plated on a semi-porous gelatinized membrane in a modified Boyden chamber (Nucleopore Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif.). Test substances were then added to the wells of the upper chamber and cells were allowed to migrate for four hours at 37° C.

Membranes were recovered, fixed, and stained and the number of cells that had migrated to the upper chamber per ten high power fields counted by a blinded observer. Background migration to DME+0.1% BSA was subtracted and the data reported as the number of cells migrated per 10 high power fields (400×). Each substance was tested in quadruplicate in each experiment and all experiments were repeated at least twice. The concentration of DAMGO was 1 μM, VEGF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.) was used as a positive control at a concentration of 200 pg/mL. The optimal concentration for VEGF was determined previously by dose-response experiments (data not shown).

The results are shown in FIG. 3 which shows that methylnaltrexone and DAMGO decreased migration in a concentration-dependent manner. FIG. 4 illustrates similar results with naloxone and DAMGO. The inactive morphine metabolite M3G exerts no angiogenic activity while M6G known to act at the mu receptor exhibited a concentration dependent effect on angiogenesis (FIG. 5).

Example 4 Treatment of Human and Mammalian Subjects with Methylnaltrexone

In a first set of experiments, mice are induced to develop tumors by transformation, inbreeding or transplantation of tumor cells. Thirty-six mice, each bearing tumors having a volume of at least 60 mm3, are randomly divided into three groups. The first group receives a control substance comprising neither an opioid nor an opioid antagonist. The second group receives an opioid, e.g., morphine administered orally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day. The third group receives an opioid, e.g., morphine administered orally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day, and the peripheral opioid antagonist methylnaltrexone, administered orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day.

The compounds are administered daily for a period of eight weeks. Diflferences in the rate of tumor growth, tumor size, a reduction in angiogenesis in the tumor and mortality of the mice between each of the groups are recorded. The results demonstrate a reduction in tumor growth and angiogenesis compared to controls or morphine alone.

In a second set of experiments, human cancer patients are enrolled in a study. Enrollees in the study are controlled for age, stage of disease, treatment types and genetic and familial factors. Participants are divided into two groups according to whether they are receiving opioids, e.g., morphine. The group receiving opioids is further randomly divided into two subgroups. One of the two subgroups receiving opioids receives a peripheral opioid antagonist, e.g., methylnaltrexone administered orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day for a period of eight weeks. The other of the two subgroups receives placebo for the same period. Differences in the rate of tumor growth, tumor size, a reduction in angiogenesis in the tumor and mortality of the participants in each of the groups are recorded.

Example 5 Treatment of Human and Mammalian Subjects with Alvimopan

Mice that have been induced to develop tumors are subjected to the protocol as described in Example 3, except that the peripheral opioid antagonist is alvimopan. The results demonstrate a reduction in tumor growth and angiogenesis compared to controls or opioid alone.

Human cancer patients are enrolled in a study conducted as described in Example 4, except that the peripheral opioid antagonist is alvimopan.

Example 6 Therapies Comprising Co-Administration of the Peripheral Opioid Antagonist Methylnaltrexone and Second Therapeutic Agent

In a first set of experiments, mice are induced to develop tumors by transformation, inbreeding or transplantation of tumor cells. Forty-eight mice, each bearing tumors having a volume of at least 60 mm3, are randomly divided into six groups. The first group receives a control substance which does not comprise an opioid, an opioid antagonist, or an anticancer agent. The second group receives an opioid, e.g., morphine administered orally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day. The third group receives an opioid, e.g., morphine administered orally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day, and the peripheral opioid antagonist methylnaltrexone, administered orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day. The fourth group receives an opioid, e.g., morphine administered orally at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day, and the peripheral opioid antagonist methylnaltrexone administered orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day with an anticancer therapeutic agent, e.g., bevacizumab (Avastin) at a dose of 5 mg/kg every 14 days. The sixth group receives an opioid, e.g., morphine, at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day and an anticancer therapeutic agent, e.g., bevacizumab (Avastin) at a dose of 5 mg/kg every 14 days.

The compounds are administered daily for a period of eight weeks. Differences in the rate of tumor growth, tumor size, a reduction in angiogenesis in the tumor and mortality of the mice in each of the groups are recorded. The results demonstrate an enhanced result (e.g., reduction in angiogenesis and tumor growth) for the groups administered the combination of opioid, opioid antagonist, and anticancer agent compared to the other groups.

In a second set of experiments, human cancer patients receiving an opioid, e.g., morphine, an anticancer therapeutic agent, e.g., bevacizumab (Avastin) or both are enrolled in a study. Enrollees in the study are controlled for age, stage and type of disease, treatment types and genetic and familial factors. Participants receiving an opioid are randomly divided into first and second groups; participants receiving an anticancer therapeutic agent, e.g., bevacizumab (Avastin) are randomly divided into third and fourth groups; participants receiving an opioid plus an anticancer agent, e.g., bevacizumab (Avastin) are randomly divided into fifth and sixth groups. The first, third and fifth groups each receive a peripheral opioid antagonist, e.g., methylnaltrexone administered orally at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day for a period of eight weeks. The second, fourth and sixth groups receive placebo for the same period. Differences in the rate of tumor growth, tumor size, a reduction in angiogenesis in the tumor and mortality of the participants in each of the groups are recorded. The results demonstrate an enhanced result (e.g., reduction in angiogenesis and tumor growth) for the groups administered the combination of opioid, opioid antagonist, and anticancer agent compared to the other groups.

Example 7 Therapies Comprising Co-administration of the Peripheral Opioid Antagonist Alvimopan and Second Therapeutic Agent

Mice that have been induced to develop tumors are subjected to the protocol as described in Example 5, except that the peripheral opioid antagonist is alvimopan. The results demonstrate an enhanced result (e.g., reduction in angiogenesis and tumor growth) for the groups administered the combination of opioid, opioid antagonist, and anticancer agent compared to the other groups.

Human cancer patients are enrolled in a study conducted as described in Example 6, except that the peripheral opioid antagonist is alvimopan. The results demonstrate an enhanced result (e.g., reduction in angiogenesis and tumor growth) for the groups administered the combination of opioid, opioid antagonist, and anticancer agent compared to the other groups.

Example 8 Effect of Opioid Antagonists on Endothelial Cell Migration/Proliferation

Cell culture and reagents-Human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (Cell Systems, Kirkland, Wash.) and human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (Clonetics. Walkersville, Md.) were cultured as previously described in EBM-2 complete medium (Clonetics) at 37° C. in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 95% air, with passages 6-10 used for experimentation (Garcia et al. 2001). Unless otherwise specified, reagents were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.). Reagents for SDS-PAGE electrophoresis were purchased from Bio-Rad (Richmond, Calif.), Immobilon-P transfer membrane from Millipore (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.). The drugs used in this study were [D-Ala2, N-MePhe\Gly5-ol]enkephalin or DAMGO (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.); naloxone, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.); N-methylnaltrexone bromide or methylnaltrexone (Mallinckrodt Specialty Chemicals, Phillipsburg, N.J.), morphine (Baxter, Deerfield, Ill.). VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor was purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, Calif.). Mouse anti-RhoA antibody, mouse anti-phosphotyrosine antibody and rho binding domain (RBD)-conjugated beads were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, N.Y.). Rabbit anti-VEGF receptor 1 (Flt-1) and anti-VEGF receptor 2 (Flk-1) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, Calif.). Mouse anti-β-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.). Secondary horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled antibodies were purchased from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway. NJ).

Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting Cellular materials were incubated with IP buffer (50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM 30 MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 0.4 mM Na3V04, 40 mM NaF, 50/lM okadaic acid, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1:250 dilution of Calbiochem protease inhibitor mixture 3). The samples were then immunoprecipitated with anti-VEGF receptor 1 or anti-VEGF receptor 2 IgG followed by SDS-PAGE in 4-15% polyacrylamide gels, transfer onto Immobilon™ membranes, and developed with specific primary and secondary antibodies. Visualization of immunoreactive bands was achieved using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences).

Determination of tyrosine phosphorylation of VEGF Receptors 1 and 2-Solubilized proteins in IP buffer (see above) were immunoprecipitated with either rabbit anti-VEGF receptor 1 or rabbit anti-VEGF receptor 2 antibody followed by SDS-PAGE in 4-15% polyacrylamide gels and transfer onto Immobilon™ membranes (Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.). After blocking nonspecific sites with 5% bovine serum albumin, the blots were incubated with either rabbit anti-VEGF receptor 1 antibody, rabbit anti-VEGF receptor 2 antibody or mouse anti-phosphotyrosine antibody followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled goat anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse IgG. Visualization of immunoreactive bands was achieved using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences).

Construction and transfection of siRNA against RhoA—The siRNA sequence targeting human against RhoA was generated using mRNA sequences from Genbank™ (gi:33876092). For each mRNA (or scramble), two targets were identified. Specifically, RhoA target sequence 1 (5′-AAGAAACTGGTGATTGTTGGT-3′) (SEQ ID NO:1), RhoA target sequence 2 (5′-AAAGACATGCTTGCTCATAGT-3) (SEQ ID NO:2), scrambled sequence 1 (5′-AAGAGAAA TCGAAACCGAAAA-3′) (SEQ ID NO:3), and scramble sequence 2 (5′-AAGAACCCAATTAAGCGCAAG-3′) (SEQ ID NO:4), were utilized. Sense and antisense oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, Iowa). For construction of the siRNA, a transcription-based kit from Ambion was used (Silencer™ siRNA construction kit). Human lung microvascular EC were then transfected with siRNA using siPORTaminc™ as the transfection reagent (Ambion, Tex.) according to the protocol provided by Ambion. Cells (˜40% confluent) were serum-starved for 1 hour followed by incubated with 3 μM (1.5 μM of each siRNA) of target siRNA (or scramble siRNA or no siRNA) for 6 hours in serum-free media. The serum-containing media was then added (1% serum final concentration) for 42 h before biochemical experiments and/or functional assays were conducted.

RhoA activation assay—After agonist and/or inhibitor treatment, EC are solubilized in solubilization buffer and incubated with rho bonding domain (RBD)-conjugated beads for 30 minutes at 4° C. The supernatant is removed and the RBD-bcads with the GTP-bound form of Rho A bound are washed extensively. The RBD beads are boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and the bound RhoA material is run on SDS-P AGE, transferred to Immobilon™ and immunqblotted with anti-RhoA antibody (Garcia et al 2001).

Human dermal microvascular EC migration assay—The endothelial cell migration assay was performed as previously described (Lingen 2002). Human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (Cell Systems, Kirkland, Wash.) were starved overnight in media containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), harvested, resuspended into Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's media (DME) with 0.1% BSA, and plated on a semi-porous gelatinized membrane in a modified Boyden chamber (Nucleopore Corporation, Pleasanton, Calif.). Test substances were then added to the wells of the upper chamber, and cells were allowed to migrate for 4 hr at 37° C. Membranes were recovered, fixed, and stained and the number of cells that had migrated to the upper chamber per 10 high-power fields was counted by a blinded observer. Background migration to DME+0.1% BSA was subtracted, and the data were reported as the number of cells migrated per 10 high-power fields (400×). Each substance was tested in quadruplicate in each experiment and all experiments were repeated at least twice. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.) was used as a positive control at a concentration of 200 pg/mL. The optimal concentration for VEGF was determined previously by dose-response experiments (data not shown).

Human pulmonary microvascular EC migration assay—Twenty-four Transwell™ units with 8 M pore size were used for monitoring in vitro cell migration. HPMVEC (˜1×10⁴ cells/well) were plated with various treatments (100 nM MNTX, 10 μM VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or siRNA) to the upper chamber and various agonists were added to the lower chamber (100 nM MS, DAMGO or VEGF). Cells were allowed to migrate for 18 hours. Cells from the upper and lower chamber were quantitated using the CellTiter96™ MTS assay (Promega, San Luis Obispo, Calif.) and read at 492 nm % migration was defined as the # of cells in the lower chamber % the number of cells in both the upper and lower chamber. Each assay was set up in triplicate, repeated at least five times and analyzed statistically by Student's t test (with statistical significance set at P<0.05).

Human pulmonary microvascular EC proliferation assay—For measuring cell growth, HPMVEC [5×10³ cells/well pretreated with various agents (100 nM MNTX, 10, μM VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor or siRNA) were incubated with 0.2 mL of serum-free media containing various agonists (100 nM MS, DAMGO or VEGF) for 24 h at 37° C. in 5% C02/95% air in 96-well culture plates. The in vitro cell proliferation assay was analyzed by measuring increases in cell number using the CellTiter96™ MTS assay (Promega, San Luis Obispo, Calif.) and read at 492 nm. Each assay was set up in triplicate, repeated at least five times and analyzed statistically by Student's t test (with statistical significance set at P<0.05).

Using the endothelial cell migration assay, it was found that MS caused a concentration-dependent increase in endothelial migration. Naloxone and MNTX alone had no effect on endothelial cell migration over a wide range of concentrations. This is demonstrated in representative photomicrographs and quantitatively (FIGS. 6 and 1, respectively). At clinically relevant concentrations of morphine, the magnitude of the effect was approximately 70% of that achieved by VEGF. Endothelial cell migration induced by morphine in concentrations as low as 10-⁷ M (FIG. 2). Morphine-based endothelial cell migration was attenuated by the mu-opioid antagonists naloxone and MNTX (in doses as low as 10⁻⁸ μM) in a concentration-dependent fashion, strongly suggesting that endothelial cell migration is mediated by morphine's action on the mu-opioid receptor (MOR). That the effect is via the MOR rather than other opioid receptors was confirmed by our observations that the highly selective synthetic enkephalin mu agonist DAMGO also induced migration in a concentration dependent fashion. The effect of DAMGO was also blocked by MNTX (FIG. 3). That the inactive morphine metabolite M3G exerts no angiogenic activity, while M6G, known to act at the mu receptor, exhibits a concentration-dependent effect on angiogenesis, confirms our hypothesis that morphine's effect on the endothelium is mediated by mu receptors (McQuay et al. 1997) (FIG. 5).

In order to assess the mechanisms of opioid and MNTX-induced effects on angiogenesis, a well-characterized EC line was used, human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMVEC). In agreement with the effects on human dermal microvascular EC, it was observed that MS, DAMGO and VEGF induce HPMVEC migration which is inhibited by MNTX (FIG. 7B). It was shown that MS, DAMGO and VEGF also stimulate HPMVEC proliferation which is attenuated by MNTX (FIG. 7A).

Considering the inhibitory effects of MNTX, a mu-opioid receptor antagonist, on VEGF-induced EC proliferation and migration, the role of opioids on VEGF receptor transactivation was examined. FIG. 8A shows that MS and DAMGO induce tyrosine phosphorylation of both VEGF receptor 1 (Flt-1) and 2 (Flk-1) which is blocked by MNTX. Further, MNTX attenuates the tyrosine phosphorylation of VEGF receptors 1 and 2 induced by VEGF. These results indicate that opioids induce VEGF receptor transactivation.

In order to address if VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase activity is required for opioid-induced angiogenesis, EC were pre-treated with a VEGF receptor 1 and 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor and measured opioid-induced EC proliferation and migration (FIG. 8B). The results indicate that the tyrosine kinase activity of VEGF receptors is important in opioid-induced EC angiogenic functions.

One important signaling molecule involved in angiogenesis is the small G-protein, RhoA (Aepfelbacher et al. 1997; Cascone et al. 2003; Hoang et al. 2004; Liu and Senger 2004). It was observed that MS, DAMGO and VEGF stimulate RhoA activation which is inhibited by MNTX (FIG. 9A). Further, VEGF receptor transactivation is important for opioid-induced RhoA activation (FIG. 9B). Silencing RhoA expression blocks opioid and VEGF-induced EC proliferation and migration (FIG. 10). These results indicate the pivotal role of RhoA activation on agonist-induced EC angiogenic activity.

Taken as a whole these findings suggest a model in which the peripheral 5 mu-opioid receptor antagonist, MNTX, attenuates opioid and VEGF-induced VEGF receptor and RhoA activation. This attenuation is important for the inhibitory role of MNTX on opioid and VEGF-mediated angiogenesis (FIG. 11).

Example 9 Methylnaltrexone Inhibits S1P, VEGF and PDGF-Induced Anglogenesis—Role of Receptor Transactivation

Assays were conducted according to the procedure similar to that described in Examples 1-3. It was observed that S1P, VEGF, PDGF, morphine and DAMGO induced proliferation (FIG. 12) (as measured by the colorimetric CellTiter™ (Promega) MTS assay) and migration (FIG. 13) (as measured by the Transwell™ (Costar) permeable membrane filter assay (8 μm pore diameter)) of EC which were inhibited by pretreatment with MNTX (0.1 μM, 1 hour). Silencing mu-opioid receptor expression (siRNA) blocks morphine and DAMGO-induced EC proliferation (FIG. 14) and migration (FIG. 15) while also significantly inhibiting S1P, VEGF and PDGF-induced EC proliferation (FIG. 14) and migration (FIG. 15). Immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblot analyses indicate that S1P, VEGF and PDGF treatment of EC induced serine/threonine phosphorylation of the mu-opioid receptor (FIG. 16) (indicating receptor transactivation) and activation of the cytoskeletal regulatory small G-protein, RhoA (FIG. 17).

Further, morphine and DAMGO treatment of EC induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the VEGF receptor (FIG. 18), PDGF receptor (FIG. 18) and SIP3 receptor (FIG. 19) along with RhoA activation. MNTX pretreatment of EC attenuated morphine, DAMGO, S1P, VEGF and PDGF induced receptor phosphorylation events and RhoA activation. Finally, silencing RhoA expression (siRNA) blocked agonist-induced EC proliferation (FIG. 20) and migration (FIG. 21). Taken together, these results indicate that MNTX inhibits agonist induced EC proliferation and migration via inhibition of receptor phosphorylation/transactivation and subsequent inhibition of Rho A activation (FIG. 22). These results suggest that MNTX inhibition of angiogenesis can be a useful therapeutic intervention for cancer treatment.

Example 10 Methylnaltrexone and Antiproliferative Compounds Synergistically Inhibit VEGF-Induced Proliferation and Migration

Assays were conducted according to the procedure similar to that described in Examples 1-3. It was observed that methylnaltrexone and 5-FU synergistically inhibit VEGF induced proliferation of endothelial cells.(FIG. 23). It was likewise observed that methylnaltrexone and Bevacizumab synergistically inhibit. VEGF induced migration of endothelial cells.(FIG. 24).

Example 11 Effects of MNTX on Various Cancer Cell Lines

The effects of MNTX on SW 480 human colorectal cancer cell line were evaluated. As shown in FIG. 25, it was observed that MNTX itself possesses antiproliferation activity in SW 480 cells (**, P<0.01 compared to control). In addition, MNTX enhanced 5-FU's tumoricidal effect (*, P<0.05 compared to 5-FU 10 μM only, approx. IC50 for this cell line). As shown in FIGS. 26, 27, and 28, respectively, similar results were obtained in HCT116 human colorectal cancer cell line, MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line, and non-small cell lung cancer cell (NSLCC) line.

Example 12 Inhibition of Mu-Opioid Receptor Signaling Decreases Lung Cancer Proliferation, Invasion and Metastasis

Prior studies have demonstrated that expression of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) is increased in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a disease with poor prognosis and limited therapies. Lewis Lung Carcinoma (LLC) cells were assayed for MOR expression to determine whether this increased expression was recapitulated in this widely used non-small cell cancer model. A 5-fold increased expression of MOR compared to primary lung epithelial or BEAS-2B cells was observed. To evaluate the role of MOR in tumor proliferation and metastasis. LLC cells were treated with an MOR specific siRNA to knock-down expression of this receptor or with the peripheral mu-opioid receptor antagonist methylnaltrexone (MNTX) to antagonize signaling through the MOR as follows.

Cell Culture

Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells were grown in RPMI-1640 media containing 10% serum. In some cases, LLC cells were treated with MOR siRNA or the peripheral MOR antagonist, methylnaltrexone (MNTX, 250 nM) prior to the addition of EGF (10 ng/ml), IGF (10 ng/ml), DAMGO (1 nM), morphine (1 nM) or serum (1, 5 or 10%). In vitro functional (cell proliferation and invasion) and biochemical studies (immunoblotting) were then conducted.

Animal Experiments

GFP/YFP-labeled LLC cells (1×10⁶, with or without MOR siRNA treatment) were either injected intravenously or into the flank of wild-type (C57BL/6J) or MOR knockout mice, and tumor growth and lung metastasis were evaluated using tumor volume measurements and/or in vivo fluorescent microscopy measurements with or without intravenous injection of ProSense and/or MMP Sense probes.

To assess the effects of MNTX, 19 C57BL/6J mice were injected with (LLC) cells (subcutaneously in the flank) (3×10⁶ cells/mouse). When the primary tumor at the site of injection reached measurable size (˜10 weeks post injection), 10 mice were then treated with continuous infusion of methylnaltrexone (MNTX, 10 mg/kg/day) and 9 mice were treated with PBS as a control with alzet mini pumps (100 μL total volume) inserted subcutaneously in the flank for 9 days. The tumor size was measured with calipers and the tumor volume V_(TT)(mm³) was calculated using the ellipsoid formula A²×B×π/6, where A represents the smaller diameter.

Invasion Assays

Invasion assays were conducted using the Cell Invasion Assay Kit available from Chemicon® International (Cat. No. ECM550). Briefly, this assay was performed in an invasion chamber with a basement membrane that was inserted into the wells of a cell culture plate. LLC cells in serum free RPMI-1640 (0.5-1.0×10⁶ cells/ml) were seeded into the invasion chamber and placed into the cell culture well containing RPMI-1640 supplemented with fetal bovine serum (1%, 5% or 10%). Invasion was measured as the percentage of cells that migrated through the basement membrane. Assays were performed using LLC cells transfected with MOR or scramble siRNA or in the presence or absence of methylnaltrexone (10 nM or 100 nM).

The results demonstrated that of the experimental tumors treated, inhibition of MOR with siRNA reduced in vitro LLC proliferation (90%) (FIG. 29A) and invasion (50-75%) (FIG. 298). Similarly, treatment of LLC cells in vitro with methylnaltrexone significantly reduced proliferation (FIG. 30A) and invasion (FIG. 308).

To determine the role of MOR in in vivo tumor progression, metastasis in wild-type C57BL/6J mice implanted with either MOR siRNA treated LLC cells or control siRNA-treated LLC cells (3 weeks post-i.v. injection, quantitated with OV-100) was measured. In this model, in vivo lung metastasis was reduced by ˜75% (FIG. 29C). In addition, primary LLC tumor volume was substantially reduced (>90%) in MOR knockout mice implanted with LLC cells compared to wild-type mice (flank injection) (FIG. 31). Continuous infusion of MNTX (10 mg/kg/day) in mice with pre-existing LLC primary tumors attenuated tumor growth (FIG. 32A) as well as the appearance of micro- (FIG. 32B) and macro-metastases in the lungs (FIG. 32C). The striking nature of the reduction in tumor growth and metastasis is exemplified by the gross pathology (FIG. 33) and Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained sections (FIG. 34) of lungs taken from these mice. In other words, there was a statistically significant reduction (p=0.009) in tumor volume with MNTX treatment.

In conclusion, it was found that MOR knockout mice do not develop significant tumors when injected with Lewis Lung Carcinoma as do their wild-type controls. Further, silencing (siRNA) the expression of the MOR in LLC cells inhibits lung metastasis by about 75% when injected into the wild-type mice. Infusion of the mu-opioid antagonists, MNTX (e.g., 10 mg/kg/day) attenuates tumor growth in the wild-type mice injected with LLC cells by up to 90%.

Example 13 Treatment of Tumors with Varying MOR Expression Levels in Humans and Mammals

In a first set of experiments, human lung cancer cell lines in cell culture are assayed for MOR mRNA and protein expression to identify cells lines with high, medium and low MOR expression levels. These cell lines are then injected into the flanks of C57BL6 mice to establish tumors with varying MOR expression levels. When the primary tumors at the site of injection reach measurable size (˜10 weeks post injection), tumor biopsies are taken and MOR mRNA and protein expression are measured to confirm that MOR expression in the tumors mirror MOR expression by the cell lines in cell culture. Mice are then treated with continuous infusion of a peripheral opioid antagonist, e.g., methylnaltrexone, at dose of 10 mg/kg/day. The tumor size is measured with calipers and the tumor volume V_(T) (mm³) is calculated using the ellipsoid formula A²×B×π/6, where A represents the smaller diameter. MOR expression levels are then correlated with tumor reduction in the presence of opioid antagonist.

In a second set of experiments, human cancer patients are enrolled in a study. Enrollees in the study are controlled for age, stage of disease, treatment types and genetic and familial factors. Tumor biopsies from each patient are assayed for MOR mRNA and protein expression and participants are divided into groups according MOR expression level. Each expression level group is further randomly divided into two subgroups. One of the two subgroups receives a peripheral opioid antagonist, e.g., methylnaltrexone, administered subcutaneously at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day for a period of eight weeks. The other of the two subgroups receives placebo for the same period. Differences in the rate of tumor growth, tumor size, a reduction in angiogenesis in the tumor and mortality of the participants in each of the groups are recorded and correlated with MOR expression.

The correlation of MOR expression to responsiveness of the cancer to treatment with the mu-opioid antagonist may be used to set standard expression levels against which increased MOR expression in a sample of a patient is indicative of responsiveness to mu-opioid antagonist treatment, of therapeutic efficiency of the antagonist and clinical prognosis, and of the risk of developing cancer or recurrence of cancer.

In summary, embodiments in accordance with the present invention provide methods of attenuating endothelial cell migration and/or proliferation associated with angiogenesis in a tissue or an organ, reducing tumor growth a volume, and/or of inhibiting metastasis of a cancer, by administering a subject in need therefor one or more opioid antagonists, especially peripheral opioid antagonists, in an effective amount to inhibit the migration and/or proliferation and angiogenesis, tumor growth and/or metastasis. The methods of the present invention may also involve administering a peripheral opioid antagonist to a patient receiving opioid treatment or not receiving such treatment. Especially suitable may be a peripheral mu-opioid antagonist. The present invention also provides methods of co-administering an opioid and a peripheral opioid antagonist to a subject in need therefore. The peripheral opioid antagonist may also be co-administered with an anticancer agent, as may the combination of the opioid and peripheral opioid antagonist be co-administered with an anticancer agent.

While the present invention has now been described and exemplified with some specificity, those skilled in the art will appreciate the various modifications, including variations, additions, and omissions that may be made in what has been described. Accordingly, it is intended that these modifications also be encompassed by the present invention and that the scope of the present invention be limited solely by the broadest interpretation that lawfully can be accorded the appended claims. All patents, publications and references cited herein are hereby fully incorporated by reference. In case of conflict between the present disclosure and incorporated patents, publications and references, the present disclosure should control. 

1. A method of treating a disorder characterized by hyperproliferation of cells overexpressing mu-opioid receptors, comprising administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a peripheral opioid antagonist.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the cells are cancer cells.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the cancer cells are cells of colon, prostate, ovarian, breast, bladder, renal, hepatocellular, pharyngeal or gastric cancer.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the peripheral opioid antagonist is a peripheral mu-opioid antagonist.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the opioid antagonist is a compound of formula (I):

wherein R is alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aryl, cycloalkyl-substituted alkyl or aryl-substituted alkyl, and X⁻ is a chloride, bromide, iodide or methylsulfate anion.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the compound of formula (I) is methylnaltrexone.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the amount is sufficient to inhibit tumor growth and/or metastasis.
 8. A method of attenuating tumor growth of cancer, metastasis of cancer, or both, in which cancer cells overexpress mu-opioid receptors, comprising administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a mu-opioid antagonist.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the mu-opioid antagonist is administered in a mode that maintains a substantially constant plasma or intratumoral level.
 10. A method of reducing metastasis of cancer in which cancer cells overexpress mu-opioid receptors, comprising administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a peripheral mu-opioid antagonist.
 11. A method of assessing responsiveness of cancer to treatment with a peripheral mu-opioid antagonist, comprising detecting the level of expression of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) in a sample taken from a subject, and comparing the level of expression of the MOR in the sample with a standard value, wherein an increased level of expression is indicative of treatment responsiveness to the mu-opioid antagonist.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the sample is obtained from lung cancer tissue.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the increased level of expression is indicative of the therapeutic efficacy of the antagonist.
 14. A method of predicting a clinical response to treatment with an opioid antagonist of a subject in need thereof, comprising detecting the expression level of mu-opioid receptors in a sample from the subject, and comparing the expression level of mu-opioid receptors in the sample from the subject with the expression level from a subject not in need of treatment, wherein increased expression of mu-opioid receptors is indicative of responsiveness to the opioid antagonist, and is predictive of a clinical response to treatment of with an opioid antagonist.
 15. A method of assessing lung cancer prognosis, comprising detecting the mu-opioid receptors expression level in a specimen collected from a subject whose lung cancer prognosis is to be assessed; and comparing the level to a standard level, an elevated level indicative that the subject is suffering from lung cancer or is at risk of recurrence of lung cancer and that the lung cancer is responsive to peripheral mu-opioid receptors antagonist treatment; and treating the subject with a peripheral mu-opioid antagonist.
 16. A method of treating a disorder characterized by hyperproliferation of cells overexpressing mu-opioid receptors, consisting essentially of administering to a subject in need thereof an effective amount of a peripheral antagonist. 